Lipid-lowering therapy with statins in high-risk elderly patients - The treatment-risk paradox

被引:327
作者
Ko, DT
Mamdani, M
Alter, DA
机构
[1] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Schulich Heart Ctr, Div Cardiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2004年 / 291卷 / 15期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.291.15.1864
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context The benefits of cardiovascular therapies such as statins for secondary prevention have been well documented, although they may not be optimally used in patients most likely to benefit. ideally, aggressiveness in the use of these beneficial therapies should correlate with baseline cardiovascular risk. Objective To examine the association between physicians' treatment aggressiveness and baseline cardiovascular risk. Design, Setting, and Patients Retrospective cohort study incorporating the use of multiple linked health care administrative databases covering more than 1.4 million elderly residents of Ontario. We included 396 077 patients aged 66 years or older who had a history of cardiovascular disease or diabetes while undergoing medical treatment and who were alive on April 1, 1998. Baseline cardiovascular risk was derived using a risk-adjustment index in which we modeled probability of death after 3 years of follow-up. Main Outcome Measure Likelihood of statin use, stratified by baseline cardiovascular risk, after adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and rural or urban residence. Results Only 75617 patients (19.1%)in this secondary prevention cohort were prescribed statins. In patients 66 to 74 years old, the adjusted probabilities of statin prescription were 37.7%, 26.7%, and 23.4% in the categories of low, intermediate, and high baseline risk, respectively. The likelihood of statin prescription was 6.4% lower (adjusted odds ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-0.95) for each year of increase in age and each 1% increase in predicted 3-year mortality risk. The influence of age also interacted synergistically with baseline risk on the prescription of statins (P<.001). Conclusions We found that prescription of statins diminished progressively as baseline cardiovascular risk and future probability of death increased. Since the benefits of a therapy are dependent on the baseline risk, the maximum benefits of statins may not be fully realized until implementation of therapy includes patients at highest risk.
引用
收藏
页码:1864 / 1870
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Effects of socioeconomic status on access to invasive cardiac procedures and on mortality after acute myocardial infarction
    Alter, DA
    Naylor, CD
    Austin, P
    Tu, JV
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (18) : 1359 - 1367
  • [2] Age, risk-benefit trade-offs, and the projected effects of evidence-based therapies
    Alter, DA
    Manuel, DG
    Gunraj, N
    Anderson, G
    Naylor, CD
    Laupacis, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 116 (08) : 540 - 545
  • [3] Processes and outcomes of care for diabetic acute myocardial infarction patients in Ontario - Do physicians undertreat?
    Alter, DA
    Khaykin, Y
    Austin, PC
    Tu, JV
    Hux, JE
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (05) : 1427 - 1434
  • [4] Issues of aging and adherence to health interventions
    Anderson, RT
    Ory, M
    Cohen, S
    McBride, JS
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2000, 21 (05): : 171S - 183S
  • [5] Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)
    Cleeman, JI
    Grundy, SM
    Becker, D
    Clark, LT
    Cooper, RS
    Denke, MA
    Howard, WJ
    Hunninghake, DB
    Illingworth, DR
    Luepker, RV
    McBride, P
    McKenney, JM
    Pasternak, RC
    Stone, NJ
    Van Horn, L
    Brewer, HB
    Ernst, ND
    Gordon, D
    Levy, D
    Rifkind, B
    Rossouw, JE
    Savage, P
    Haffner, SM
    Orloff, DG
    Proschan, MA
    Schwartz, JS
    Sempos, CT
    Shero, ST
    Murray, EZ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (19): : 2486 - 2497
  • [6] Collins R, 2002, LANCET, V360, P7, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09327-3
  • [7] Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels - Results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS
    Downs, JR
    Clearfield, M
    Weis, S
    Whitney, E
    Shapiro, DR
    Beere, PA
    Langendorfer, A
    Stein, EA
    Kruyer, W
    Gotto, AM
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (20): : 1615 - 1622
  • [8] Primary angioplasty and selection bias in patients presenting late (⟩12 h) after onset of chest pain and ST elevation myocardial infarction
    Elad, Y
    French, WJ
    Shavelle, DM
    Parsons, LS
    Sada, MJ
    Every, NR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (05) : 826 - 833
  • [9] Fonarow GC, 2001, CIRCULATION, V103, P38
  • [10] Serum total cholesterol concentrations and awareness, treatment, and control of hypercholesterolemia among US adults - Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2000
    Ford, ES
    Mokdad, AH
    Giles, WH
    Mensah, GA
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2003, 107 (17) : 2185 - 2189