Effect of limited DNA methylation reprogramming in the normal sheep embryo on somatic cell nuclear transfer

被引:183
作者
Beaujean, N
Taylor, J
Gardner, J
Wilmut, I
Meehan, R
Young, L
机构
[1] Roslin Inst, Div Gene Express & Dev, Roslin EH25 9PS, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Biomed & Clin Lab Sci, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Western Gen Hosp, MRC, Human Genet Unit, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
developmental biology; early development; embryo; gene regulation;
D O I
10.1095/biolreprod.103.026559
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Active demethylation of cytosine residues in the sperm genome before forming a functional zygotic nucleus is thought to be an important function of the oocyte cytoplasm for subsequent embryonic development in the mouse. Conversely, this event does not occur in the sheep or rabbit zygote and occurs only partially in the cow. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of limited methylation reprogramming in the normal sheep embryo on reprogramming somatic nuclei. Sheep fibroblast somatic nuclei were partially demethylated after electrofusion with recipient sheep oocytes and undergo a stepwise passive loss of DNA methylation during early development, as determined by 5-methylcytosine immunostaining on interphase embryonic nuclei. A similar decrease takes place with in vivo-derived sheep embryos up to the eight-cell stage, although nuclear transfer embryos exhibit a consistently higher level of methylation at each stage. Between the eight-cell and blastocyst stages, DNA methylation levels in nuclear transfer embryos are comparable with those derived in vivo, but the distribution of methylated DNA is abnormal in a high proportion. By correlating DNA methylation with developmental potential at individual stages, our results suggest that somatic nuclei that do not undergo rapid reorganization of their DNA before the first mitosis fail to develop within two to three cell cycles and that the observed methylation defects in early cleavage stages more likely occur as a direct consequence of failed nuclear reorganization than in failed demethylation capacity. However, because only embryos with reorganized chromatin appear to survive the 16-cell and morula stages, failure to demethylate the trophectoderm cells of the blastocyst is likely to directly impact on developmental potential by altering programmed patterns of gene expression in extra-embryonic tissues. Thus, both remodeling of DNA and epigenetic reprogramming appear critical for development of both fertilized and nuclear transfer embryos.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 193
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Non-conservation of mammalian preimplantation methylation dynamics [J].
Beaujean, N ;
Hartshorne, G ;
Cavilla, J ;
Taylor, J ;
Gardner, J ;
Wilmut, I ;
Meehan, R ;
Young, L .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (07) :R266-R267
[2]   DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory [J].
Bird, A .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 16 (01) :6-21
[3]   Oct4 distribution and level in mouse clones:: consequences for pluripotency [J].
Boiani, M ;
Eckardt, S ;
Schöler, HR ;
McLaughlin, KJ .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 16 (10) :1209-1219
[4]   Flow cytometric cell cycle analysis of cultured porcine fetal fibroblast cells [J].
Boquest, AC ;
Day, BN ;
Prather, RS .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 1999, 60 (04) :1013-1019
[5]   Delayed and incomplete reprogramming of chromosome methylation patterns in bovine cloned embryos [J].
Bourc'his, D ;
Le Bourhis, D ;
Patin, D ;
Niveleau, A ;
Comizzoli, P ;
Renard, JP ;
Viegas-Péquignot, E .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (19) :1542-1546
[6]   Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line [J].
Campbell, KHS ;
McWhir, J ;
Ritchie, WA ;
Wilmut, I .
NATURE, 1996, 380 (6569) :64-66
[7]   Abnormal regulation of DNA methyltransferase expression in cloned mouse embryos [J].
Chung, YG ;
Ratnam, S ;
Chaillet, JR ;
Latham, KE .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2003, 69 (01) :146-153
[8]   Analysis of gene transcription in bovine nuclear transfer embryos reconstructed with granulosa cell nuclei [J].
Daniels, R ;
Hall, V ;
Trounson, AO .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2000, 63 (04) :1034-1040
[9]  
de Capoa A, 1998, CYTOMETRY, V31, P85, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19980201)31:2<85::AID-CYTO3>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-H