The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future

被引:416
作者
Levy, PE
Williams, JR
机构
[1] Univ Akron, Dept Psychol, Akron, OH 44325 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Dept Psychol, Indianapolis, IN 46142 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Performance appraisal research over the last 10 years has begun to examine the effects of the social context on the appraisal process. Drawing from previous theoretical work, we developed a model of this process and conducted a systematic review of the relevant research. This review of over 300 articles suggests that as a field we have become much more cognizant of the importance of the social context within which the performance appraisal process operates. First, research has broadened the traditional conceptualization of performance appraisal effectiveness to include and emphasize ratee reactions. Second, the influence that the feedback environment or feedback culture has on performance appraisal outcomes is an especially recent focus that seems to have both theoretical and applied implications. Finally, there appears to be a reasonably large set of distal variables such as technology HR strategies, and economic conditions that are potentially important for understanding the appraisal process, but which have received very little research attention. We believe that the focus of recent performance appraisal research has widespread implications ranging from theory development and enhancement to practical application. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 905
页数:25
相关论文
共 139 条
[1]   THE EFFECTS OF SOURCE CREDIBILITY AND PERFORMANCE RATING DISCREPANCY ON REACTIONS TO MULTIPLE RATERS [J].
ALBRIGHT, MD ;
LEVY, PE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 25 (07) :577-600
[2]   The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment [J].
Allen, TD ;
Rush, MC .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (02) :247-260
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, REV PUBLIC PERS ADM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, J MANAG DEV, DOI DOI 10.1108/02621719910273569
[5]  
[Anonymous], J WORKPLACE LEARNING
[6]  
[Anonymous], ADV INTERDISCIPLINAR
[7]  
[Anonymous], HUMAN RESOURCE DEV Q
[8]   The relationship between rater affect and three sources of 360-degree feedback ratings [J].
Antonioni, D ;
Park, H .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2001, 27 (04) :479-495
[9]   Self-versus others' ratings as predictors of assessment center ratings: Validation evidence for 360-degree feedback programs [J].
Atkins, PWB ;
Wood, RE .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 55 (04) :871-904
[10]   THE INFLUENCE OF UPWARD FEEDBACK ON SELF-RATINGS AND FOLLOWER-RATINGS OF LEADERSHIP [J].
ATWATER, L ;
ROUSH, P ;
FISCHTHAL, A .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 48 (01) :35-59