Isolation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria from the air plume downwind of a swine confined or concentrated animal feeding operation

被引:116
作者
Gibbs, Shawn G.
Green, Christopher F.
Tarwater, Patrick M.
Mota, Linda C.
Mena, Kristina D.
Scarpino, Pasquale V.
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Ctr Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, El Paso, TX 79902 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
antibiotic resistant; bioacrosols; CAFO; confined/concentrated animal feeding operation; microorganisms;
D O I
10.1289/ehp.8910
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: In this study we evaluated the levels of antibiotic- and multidrug-resistant bacteria in bioaerosols upwind, within, and downwind at locations 25 in, 50 in, 100 in, and 150 in from a swine confined animal feeding operation. DESIGN: We used Andersen two-stage samplers to collect bacterial samples, the replicate plate method to isolate organisms, and the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method to determine antibiotic resistance. RESULTS: The percentage of organisms resistant to at least two antibiotic classes and all four classes evaluated were, respectively, 2.1 and 3.0 times higher inside (n = 69) than upwind (n = 59) of the facility. Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent organism recovered. Concentrations of antibiotic-resistant S. aureus decreased with increasing distance from the facility. Using Fisher's exact methods, the change in distribution of antibiotic resistance profiles for each antibiotic was statistically significant (oxytetracycline, p = 0.010; tetracycline, p = 0.014; ampicillin, p = 0.007; erythromycin, p = 0.035); however, this relationship was not seen with lincomycin and penicillin (p > 0.05). In addition, the levels of antibiotic-resistant S. aureas 25 in downwind were significantly greater than the levels from samples taken upwind from the facility for the same four antibiotics (p < 0.05). The percentage of resistant group A streptococci and fecal coliform increased within the facility compared with upwind values for all antibiotics evaluated, except for lincomycin. The percentage of resistant total coliform organisms increased within the facility compared with upwind values for oxytetracycline and tetracycline. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial concentrations with multiple antibiotic resistances or multidrug resistance were recovered inside and outside to (at least) 150 in downwind of this facility at higher percentages than upwind. Bacterial concentrations with multiple antibiotic resistances were found within and downwind of the facility even after subtherapeutic antibiotics were discontinued. This could pose a potential human health effect for those who work within or live in close proximity to these facilities.
引用
收藏
页码:1032 / 1037
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
BAUER AW, 1966, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V45, P493
[2]   Resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from sheep to various antimicrobial agents [J].
Burriel, AR .
RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 1997, 63 (02) :189-190
[3]   Airborne multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from a concentrated swine feeding operation [J].
Chapin, A ;
Rule, A ;
Gibson, K ;
Buckley, T ;
Schwab, K .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 113 (02) :137-142
[4]   Antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci recovered from commercial swine carcasses: effect of feed additives [J].
Davies, R ;
Roberts, TA .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 29 (05) :327-333
[5]  
DUPONT HL, 1987, REV INFECT DIS, V9, P447
[6]   Airborne antibiotic resistant and nonresistant bacteria and fungi recovered from two swine herd confined animal feeding operations [J].
Gibbs, SG ;
Green, CF ;
Tarwater, PM ;
Scarpino, PV .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE, 2004, 1 (11) :699-706
[7]   Bacterial plume emanating from the air surrounding swine confinement operations [J].
Green, CF ;
Gibbs, SG ;
Tarwater, PM ;
Mota, LC ;
Scarpino, PV .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE, 2006, 3 (01) :9-15
[8]  
HAGLIND P, 1987, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V29, P904
[9]  
JENSEN PA, 1992, AM IND HYG ASSOC J, V53, P660, DOI 10.1202/0002-8894(1992)053<0660:EOEBSC>2.0.CO
[10]  
2