Forage yield and quality for monocrops and mixtures of small grain cereals

被引:69
作者
Juskiw, PE [1 ]
Helm, JH [1 ]
Salmon, DF [1 ]
机构
[1] Alberta Agr Food & Rural Dev, Field Crop Dev Ctr, Lacombe, AB T4L 1WB, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2000.401138x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Cereals are an important substrate for silage production in the short growing season of the northern Prairies. Our objectives were to determine the effects of seeding rate, species, and harvest date on the forage yield and quality of cereals. Three field studies, were conducted to evaluate the productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), triticale (x Triticosecale rimpaui Wittm.), and rye (Secale cereale L.) grown as monocrops or in various mixtures, Seeding rates ranged from 250 to 750 seeds m(-2). Harvest times were based on the maturity of the principal cereal in each mixture, Pew effects of seeding rate on yield or quality were Pound, but when effects were found, higher seeding rates were associated with higher yields, lower moisture content, and higher fiber content. All treatments produced high quality forage as measured by neutral detergent fiber (NDF), from 515 g kg(-1) for early-harvested tests to 656 g kg(-1) for late-harvested tests, and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents, from 310 g kg(-1) for early-harvested tests to 387 g kg(-1) for late-harvested tests. Protein was low, ranging from 61.5 to 101.0 kg(-1). Biomass yields ranged from 10.1 to 16.5 Mg ha(-1) the barley cultivar tests, 7.0 to 18.5 Mg ha(-1) in the spring cereal tests, and 10.8 to 12.2 Mg ha(-1) in the winter cereal tests. Although, some exceptions occurred, Forage yield and quality of cereal mixtures were generally intermediate to monocrop production, especially for moisture and fiber content, suggesting that planting species mixtures could extend the harvest period and result in higher-quality silage.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 147
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   EVALUATION OF BARLEY SILAGE HARVESTED AT BOOT AND SOFT DOUGH STAGES [J].
ACOSTA, YM ;
STALLINGS, CC ;
POLAN, CE ;
MILLER, CN .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1991, 74 (01) :167-176
[2]  
*ALB AGR FOOD RUR, 1995, STAND OP PROC MAN 1
[3]   POSTFLOWERING FORAGE POTENTIAL OF SPRING AND WINTER CEREAL MIXTURES [J].
BARON, VS ;
NAJDA, HG ;
SALMON, DF ;
DICK, AC .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1992, 72 (01) :137-145
[4]   SILAGE FERMENTATION AND IN-VITRO DEGRADATION OF MONOSACCHARIDE CONSTITUENTS OF WHEAT HARVESTED AT 2 STAGES OF MATURITY [J].
BENGHEDALIA, D ;
KABALA, A ;
MIRON, J ;
YOSEF, E .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1995, 43 (09) :2428-2431
[5]  
BERGEN WG, 1991, J ANIM SCI, V69, P1766
[6]   SMALL GRAIN CROP FORAGE POTENTIAL .1. BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL DETERMINANTS OF QUALITY, AND YIELD [J].
CHERNEY, JH ;
MARTEN, GC .
CROP SCIENCE, 1982, 22 (02) :227-231
[7]  
Daccord R., 1993, Revue Suisse d'Agriculture, V25, P283
[8]   SPRING NITROGEN APPLICATION - EFFECTS ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF BARLEY SILAGE [J].
DIRIENZO, DB ;
WEBB, KE ;
BRANN, DE .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1991, 4 (01) :45-50
[9]   CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION AND INVITRO DRY-MATTER AND ORGANIC-MATTER DIGESTIBILITY OF TRITICALE FORAGE [J].
FEARON, AL ;
FELIX, A ;
SAPRA, VT .
JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ACKER UND PFLANZENBAU, 1990, 164 (04) :262-270
[10]   In situ degradability of forages cut at different stages of growth [J].
Hadjipanayiotou, M ;
Antoniou, I ;
Theodoridou, M ;
Photiou, A .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1996, 45 (01) :49-53