Sucralfate in the prevention of treatment-induced diarrhea in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase III double-blind placebo-controlled trial

被引:49
作者
Martenson, JA
Bollinger, JW
Sloan, JA
Novotny, PJ
Urias, RE
Michalak, JC
Shanahan, TG
Mailliard, JA
Levitt, R
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Radiat Oncol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Community Clin Oncol Program, Duluth, MN USA
[3] Grand Forks Ltd, Grand Forks, ND USA
[4] Meritcare Hosp, CCOP, Fargo, ND USA
[5] Siouxland Hematol Oncol Associates, Sioux City, IA USA
[6] Carle Canc Ctr, CCOP, Urbana, IL USA
[7] Missouri Valley Canc Consortium, Omaha, NE USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2000.18.6.1239
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Randomized studies have suggested that sucralfate is effective in mitigating diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy (RT). This North Central Cancer Treatment Group study was undertaken to confirm the antidiarrheal effect of sucralfate. Several other measures of bowel function were also assessed. Patients and Methods: Patients receiving pelvic RT to ct minimum of 45 Gy at 1.7 to 2.1 Gy/d were eligible for the study. Patients were assigned randomly, in double-blind fashion, to receive sucralfate (1.5 g orally every 6 hours) or an identical looking placebo during pelvic RT. Results: One hundred twenty-three patients were randomly assigned and found assessable. Overall, there was no significant difference in patient characteristics between those receiving sucralfate and those receiving placebo. Moderate or worse diarrhea was observed in 53% of patients receiving sucralfate versus 41% of those receiving placebo. Compared with patients receiving placebo, more sucralfate-treated patients reported fecal incontinence (16% v 34%, respectively; P = .04) and need for protective clothing (8% v 23%, respectively; P = .04). The incidence and severity of nausea were worse among those taking sucralfate (P = .03). Analysis of patient-reported symptoms 10 to 12 months after PT showed a nonsignificant trend toward more problems in patients taking sucralfate than in those taking placebo (average, 2.3 v 1.9 problems, respectively; P = .34). Conclusion: Sucralfate did not decrease pelvic RT-related bowel toxicity by any of the end points measured and seems to have aggravated some gastrointestinal symptoms. (C) 2000 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1245
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
AARONSON NK, 1991, CANCER, V67, P839, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19910201)67:3+<839::AID-CNCR2820671415>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-0
[3]  
BURKE MB, 1991, CANC CHEMOTHERAPY NU, P438
[4]  
Cella D F, 1995, Oncology (Williston Park), V9, P47
[5]  
HENRIKSON R, 1990, European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, V11, P299
[6]   EFFECTS OF SUCRALFATE ON ACUTE AND LATE BOWEL DISCOMFORT FOLLOWING RADIOTHERAPY OF PELVIC CANCER [J].
HENRIKSSON, R ;
FRANZEN, L ;
LITTBRAND, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (06) :969-975
[7]  
HOLLANDER D, 1981, J CLIN GASTROENTEROL, V3, P153
[8]   NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS [J].
KAPLAN, EL ;
MEIER, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) :457-481
[9]   A COMPARISON OF SIZE AND POWER CALCULATIONS FOR THE WILCOXON STATISTIC FOR ORDERED CATEGORICAL-DATA [J].
KOLASSA, JE .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (14) :1577-1581
[10]   THE LONG-TERM EFFECT OF ADJUVANT POSTOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY FOR RECTAL-CARCINOMA ON BOWEL FUNCTION [J].
KOLLMORGEN, CF ;
MEAGHER, AP ;
WOLFF, BG ;
PEMBERTON, JH ;
MARTENSON, JA ;
ILSTRUP, DM .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 220 (05) :676-682