The microfinance schism

被引:382
作者
Morduch, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
poverty; credit; microenterprise; Bangladesh; Indonesia;
D O I
10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00151-5
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Leading advocates for microfinance have put forward an enticing "win-win" proposition: microfinance institutions that follow the principles of good banking will also be those that alleviate the most poverty. This vision forms the core of widely-circulated "best practices," but as a general proposition the vision is fully supported neither by logic nor by the available empirical evidence. Recognizing the limits to the win-win proposition is an important step toward reaching a more constructive dialogue between microfinance advocates that privilege financial development and those that privilege social impacts. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 629
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] ADAMS DW, 1984, UNDERMINING RURAL DE
  • [2] [Anonymous], J EC LIT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1998, POVERTY ASSESSMENT M
  • [4] BANERJEE AV, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P211
  • [5] BRUGGER E. A, 1995, NEW PERSPECTIVES FIN
  • [6] *CGAP, 1995, CGAP FOCUS OCT
  • [7] CHRISTEN RP, 1995, 10 US AG INT DEV
  • [8] Conning J., 1999, J DEV EC, V60
  • [9] Consultative Group to Assist the Poorest [CGAP], 1996, 1 CGAP
  • [10] A CLASS OF DECOMPOSABLE POVERTY MEASURES
    FOSTER, J
    GREER, J
    THORBECKE, E
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1984, 52 (03) : 761 - 766