Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk: Evaluation of a Novel Method of Measuring Breast Tissue Volumes

被引:108
作者
Boyd, Norman [1 ]
Martin, Lisa [1 ]
Gunasekar, Anoma [1 ,2 ]
Melnichouk, Olga [1 ]
Maudsley, Gord [2 ]
Peressotti, Chris [2 ]
Yaffe, Martin [2 ]
Minkin, Salomon [1 ]
机构
[1] Ontario Canc Inst, Campbell Family Inst Breast Canc Res, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
关键词
QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0107
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Mammographic density has been found to be strongly associated with risk of breast cancer. We have assessed a novel method of assessing breast tissue that is fully automated, does not require an observer, and measures the volume, rather than the projected area, of the relevant tissues in digitized screen-film mammogram. Methods: Sixteen mammography machines in seven locations in Toronto were calibrated to allow the estimation of the proportion of radiologically dense (stromal and epithelial tissue) and nondense (fatty) tissue represented in each pixel of the mammographic image. This information was combined with a measurement of breast thickness to calculate the volumes of these tissues. Women with newly diagnosed breast cancer (cases) identified on these mammography machines during the years 2000 to 2003 were compared with other women of the same age who did not have breast cancer (controls). Results: Three hundred sixty-four cases and 656 controls were recruited, epidemiologic data were collected, screen-film mammograms were digitized and measured using both a computer-assisted thresholding method, and the new measure of the volume of density. After adjustment for other risk factors, the odds ratio for those in the 5th quintile compared with the 1st quintile was 1.98 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-3.1) for the volume measure and 1.86 (95% CI, 1.1-3.0) for the area measurement. After inclusion of the volume and area measures in a predictive model, the volume measure lost significance, whereas the area measure remained significant. Conclusions: Contrary to our expectations, measurement of the volume of breast tissue did not improve prediction of breast cancer risk. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009,-18(6):1754-62)
引用
收藏
页码:1754 / 1762
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   MEASUREMENT IN MEDICINE - THE ANALYSIS OF METHOD COMPARISON STUDIES [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1983, 32 (03) :307-317
[2]   Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies [J].
Antoniou, A ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Narod, S ;
Risch, HA ;
Eyfjord, JE ;
Hopper, JL ;
Loman, N ;
Olsson, H ;
Johannsson, O ;
Borg, Å ;
Pasini, B ;
Radice, P ;
Manoukian, S ;
Eccles, DM ;
Tang, N ;
Olah, E ;
Anton-Culver, H ;
Warner, E ;
Lubinski, J ;
Gronwald, J ;
Gorski, B ;
Tulinius, H ;
Thorlacius, S ;
Eerola, H ;
Nevanlinna, H ;
Syrjäkoski, K ;
Kallioniemi, OP ;
Thompson, D ;
Evans, C ;
Peto, J ;
Lalloo, F ;
Evans, DG ;
Easton, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) :1117-1130
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]  
Boyd NF, 1998, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V7, P1133
[5]   Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer [J].
Boyd, NF ;
Rommens, JM ;
Vogt, K ;
Lee, V ;
Hopper, JL ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Paterson, AD .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (10) :798-808
[6]   Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Guo, Helen ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Fishell, Eve ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) :227-236
[7]  
BRESLOW NE, 1980, IARC SCI PUBL, V32, P14
[8]   THE QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITIES [J].
BYNG, JW ;
BOYD, NF ;
FISHELL, E ;
JONG, RA ;
YAFFE, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (10) :1629-1638
[9]   Evaluating the effectiveness of using standard mammogram form to predict breast cancer risk: Case-control study [J].
Ding, Jane ;
Warren, Ruth ;
Warsi, Iqbal ;
Day, Nick ;
Thompson, Deborah ;
Brady, Michael ;
Tromans, Christopher ;
Highnam, Ralph ;
Easton, Douglas .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2008, 17 (05) :1074-1081
[10]   RISKS OF CANCER IN BRCA1-MUTATION CARRIERS [J].
FORD, D ;
EASTON, DF ;
BISHOP, DT ;
NAROD, SA ;
GOLDGAR, DE ;
HAITES, N ;
MILNER, B ;
ALLAN, L ;
PONDER, BAJ ;
PETO, J ;
SMITH, S ;
STRATTON, M ;
LENOIR, GM ;
FEUNTEUN, J ;
LYNCH, H ;
ARASON, A ;
BARKARDOTTIR, R ;
EGILSSON, V ;
BLACK, DM ;
KELSELL, D ;
SPURR, N ;
DEVILEE, P ;
CORNELISSE, CJ ;
VARSEN, H ;
BIRCH, JM ;
SKOLNICK, M ;
SANTIBANEZKOREF, MS ;
TEARE, D ;
STEEL, M ;
PORTER, D ;
COHEN, BB ;
CAROTHERS, A ;
SMYTH, E ;
WEBER, B ;
NEWBOLD, B ;
BOEHNKE, M ;
COLLINS, FS ;
CANNONALBRIGHT, LA ;
GOLDGAR, D .
LANCET, 1994, 343 (8899) :692-695