Imaging the enzymatic digestion of bacterial cellulose ribbons reveals the endo character of the cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Humicola insolens and its mode of synergy with cellobiohydrolase Cel7A

被引:172
作者
Boisset, C
Fraschini, C
Schülein, M
Henrissat, B
Chanzy, H
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble 1, CNRS, Ctr Rech Macromol Vegetales, F-38041 Grenoble 9, France
[2] CNRS, IFR1, F-13402 Marseille 20, France
[3] Novo Nordisk AS, DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AEM.66.4.1444-1452.2000
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Dispersed cellulose ribbons from bacterial cellulose were subjected to digestion with cloned Cel7A (cellobiohydrolase [CBH] I) and Cel6A (CBH II) from Humicola insolens either alone or in a mixture and in the presence of an excess of beta-glucosidase. Both Cel7A and Cel6A were effective in partially converting the ribbons into soluble sugars, Cel7A being more active than Cel6A In combination, these enzymes showed substantial synergy culminating with a molar ratio of approximately two-thirds Cel6A and one-third Cel7A, Ultrastructural transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations indicated that Cel7A induced a thinning of the cellulose ribbons, whereas Cel6A cut the ribbons into shorter elements, indicating an endo type of action. These observations. together with the examination of the digestion kinetics, indicate that Cel6A ran be classified as an endo-processive enzyme, whereas Cel7A is essentially a processive enzyme, Thus, the synergy resulting from the mixing of Cel6A and Cel7A can be explained by the partial endo character of Cel6A. A preparation of bacterial cellulose ribbons appears to be an appropriate substrate, superior to Valonia or bacterial cellulose microcrystals, to visualize directly by TEM the endo-processivity of an enzyme such as Cel6A.
引用
收藏
页码:1444 / 1452
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Amano Y, 1996, J BIOCHEM, V120, P1123
[2]   A bifunctionalized fluorogenic tetrasaccharide as a substrate to study cellulases [J].
Armand, S ;
Drouillard, S ;
Schulein, M ;
Henrissat, B ;
Driguez, H .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 272 (05) :2709-2713
[3]   Identification of two functionally different classes of exocellulases [J].
Barr, BK ;
Hsieh, YL ;
Ganem, B ;
Wilson, DB .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 35 (02) :586-592
[4]   MOLECULAR-BIOLOGY OF CELLULOSE DEGRADATION [J].
BEGUIN, P .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1990, 44 :219-248
[5]  
BIELY P, 1993, P 2 TRICEL S TRICH R, P99
[6]  
BOISSET C, 1998, CARBOHYDRASES TRICHO
[7]   UNDIRECTIONAL DEGRADATION OF VALONIA CELLULOSE MICROCRYSTALS SUBJECTED TO CELLULASE ACTION [J].
CHANZY, H ;
HENRISSAT, B .
FEBS LETTERS, 1985, 184 (02) :285-288
[8]  
Chanzy H., 1983, CARBOHYD POLYM, V3, P161, DOI 10.1016/0144-8617(83)90016-4
[9]   HIGH-LEVEL EXPRESSION OF RECOMBINANT GENES IN ASPERGILLUS-ORYZAE [J].
CHRISTENSEN, T ;
WOELDIKE, H ;
BOEL, E ;
MORTENSEN, SB ;
HJORTSHOEJ, K ;
THIM, L ;
HANSEN, MT .
BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 1988, 6 (12) :1419-1422
[10]   STRUCTURES AND MECHANISMS OF GLYCOSYL HYDROLASES [J].
DAVIES, G ;
HENRISSAT, B .
STRUCTURE, 1995, 3 (09) :853-859