A comparison of forearm and thumb muscle electromyographic responses to the use of laparoscopic instruments with either a finger grasp or a palm grasp

被引:43
作者
Berguer, R [1 ]
Gerber, S
Kilpatrick, G
Remler, M
Beckley, D
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Surg, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Neurol, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[3] VA No Calif Hlth Care Syst, Martinez, CA 94553 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Biomed Engn Program, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
关键词
laparoscopy; ergonomics; electromyography;
D O I
10.1080/001401399184721
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Laparoscopic techniques allow for less-invasive treatment of common surgical problems. Laparoscopic instruments are different from standard surgical instruments and generally incorporate a pistol-grip handle configuration with rings for the fingers. This handle configuration has been reported as being uncomfortable, leading to anger compression neuropathies in some cases. As an alternative, the surgeon can choose to grasp laparoscopic instruments using a mon powerful palm grip during grasping motions. This study evaluates the hypothesis that the use of the palm grip requires less muscle tension than the finger-grip when grasping with laparoscopic instruments. Nine general surgeons used an Autosuture(R) laparoscopic grasper with a ringed pistol-grip handle held in both a finger-in-ring (F) or palm (P) hand grip position to grasp and close two spring-loaded metal plates. The same task was performed with a surgical haemostat clamp (H) for comparison, Each subject performed the grasping task in a random sequence for the three instrument configurations at two grasping forces levels (0.7 and 4.2 N), and with the instrument at three angles to the subjects' sagittal plane (0 degrees, 45 degrees and 90 degrees). Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals were acquired from the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU). extensor digitorum comunis (EDC) and the thenar compartment (TH). The peak root mean squared (RMS) ER IG voltage was averaged for five repetitions at each instrument, force and angle condition. Statistical analysis was carried out by repeated measures ANOVA. The muscle EMC RMS amplitude while using the palm grip was decreased in the FDS, TH and EDC, was unchanged in the ECU and FCU? and was slightly higher in the FDP when compared with the finger grip. These differences were most prominent at 90 degrees to the sagittal plane where the subjects' wrists neared maximal flexion. It is concluded that the palm grip is more powerful than the finger grip when grasping with laparoscopic instruments, particularly at angles perpendicular to the surgeon's sagittal plane.
引用
收藏
页码:1634 / 1645
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   An ergonomic comparison of in-line vs pistol-grip handle configuration in a laparoscopic grasper [J].
Berguer, R ;
Gerber, S ;
Kilpatrick, G ;
Beckley, D .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (06) :805-808
[2]   Ergonomics in the operating room [J].
Berguer, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 171 (04) :385-386
[3]   Laparoscopic instruments cause increased forearm fatigue: A subjective and objective comparison of open and laparoscopic techniques [J].
Berguer, R ;
Remler, M ;
Beckley, D .
MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 1997, 6 (01) :36-40
[4]  
Delagi EF., 1980, ANATOMIC GUIDE ELECT
[5]   ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC ACTIVITY DURING TYPEWRITER AND KEYBOARD USE [J].
FERNSTROM, E ;
ERICSON, MO ;
MALKER, H .
ERGONOMICS, 1994, 37 (03) :477-484
[6]  
GERBER S, 1998, IN PRESS COMP STUDY
[7]  
GREEN FL, 1994, OPERATING ROOM CONFI, P34
[8]   Neuropraxia following laparoscopic procedures: An occupational injury [J].
Horgan, LF ;
ORiordan, DC ;
Doctor, N .
MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 1997, 6 (01) :33-35
[9]  
JOHNSON SL, 1993, HAND CLIN, V9, P299
[10]  
KALSER SC, 1993, AM J SURG, V165, P390