Author self-citation in the diabetes literature

被引:80
作者
Gami, AS
Montori, VA
Wilczynski, NL
Haynes, RB
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1503/cmaj.1031879
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Author self-citation is the practice of citing one's previous publications in a new publication. Its extent is unknown. We studied author self-citation, choosing the major clinical field of diabetes mellitus to represent the general medical literature. Methods: We identified every article about diabetes mellitus in 170 hand-searched clinical journals published in 2000. For every article, we recorded the bibliographic citation an publication type (original or review article) and assessed the methodologic rigour. Citation information was obtained from the ISI Web of Knowledge in April 2003. Results: Of 49 028 articles, 289 were about diabetes mellitus and had citation information. Citation counts ranged from 0 to 347 (median 6, interquartile range [IQR] 2-12). Author self-citation counts ranged from 0 to 16 (median 1, IQR 0-2). Author self-citations accounted for an average of 18% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15%-21%) and a median of 7% (95% CI 5%-11%) of all citations of each publication that was cited at least once (n = 266). Original articles had double the mean proportion of author self-citations compared with review articles (19% v. 9%; median 7% v. 0%, difference 7%, 95% CI 0-10%). Methodologic rigour and review type were not significantly associated with subsequent author self-citation. Interpretation: Nearly one-fifth of all citations to articles about diabetes mellitus in clinical journals in the year 2000 were author self-citations. The frequency of self-citation was not associated with the quality of publications. These findings are likely applicable to the general clinical medicine literature and may have important implications for the assessment of journal or publication importance and the process of scientific discovery.
引用
收藏
页码:1925 / 1927
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals [J].
Callaham, M ;
Wears, RL ;
Weber, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (21) :2847-2850
[2]   Introducing Selfcite 2.0 - Career enhancing software [J].
Craddock, N ;
ODonovan, MC ;
Owen, MJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7072) :1659-1660
[3]   A report card for journals [J].
DeMaria, AN .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 42 (05) :952-953
[4]   Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor [J].
Fassoulaki, A ;
Paraskeva, A ;
Papilas, K ;
Karabinis, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 84 (02) :266-269
[5]  
Garfield E., 1992, Science and Public Policy, DOI DOI 10.1093/SPP/19.5.321
[6]   Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication [J].
Hyland, K .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 54 (03) :251-259
[7]  
Kapoor V K, 1993, Indian J Gastroenterol, V12 Suppl 1, pS12
[8]   Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts [J].
Montori, Victor M. ;
Wilczynski, Nancy L. ;
Morgan, Douglas ;
Haynes, R. Brian .
BMC MEDICINE, 2003, 1