Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Compared With ORIF and Primary Subtalar Arthrodesis for Treatment of Sanders Type IV Calcaneal Fractures: A Randomized Multicenter Trial

被引:55
作者
Buckley, Richard [1 ]
Leighton, Ross [1 ]
Sanders, David [1 ]
Poon, Jeffrey [1 ]
Coles, Chad P. [1 ]
Stephen, David [1 ]
Paolucci, Elizabeth O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Canadian Orthopaed Trauma Soc, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
ORIF; fusion; Sanders IV calcaneal fractures; multicenter trial; DISPLACED INTRAARTICULAR FRACTURES; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT; FOOT FUNCTION; MANAGEMENT; VALIDITY; SF-36;
D O I
10.1097/BOT.0000000000000191
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Objectives: To compare long-term health outcome of Sanders type IV calcaneal fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus ORIF plus primary subtalar arthrodesis (PSTA). Design: Randomized prospective multicenter trial. Setting: Four Level 1 trauma hospitals in Canada. Patients: Thirty-one patients with 31 Sanders IV displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Intervention: Seventeen patients were treated with a standard protocol involving a lateral approach for ORIF. Fourteen patients were treated with a standard protocol involving a lateral approach with ORIF + PSTA. Main Outcome Measurements: Health outcomes were assessed with 4 validated instruments: (1) the Short Form 36 version 2 (SF-36), (2) the Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment Survey, (3) the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society's Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, and (4) the Visual Analogue Scale. Results: From 2004 to 2011, 26 patients (26 displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures) were followed for a minimum of 2 years (81% follow-up). No statistical difference was found between the results for ORIF compared with ORIF + PSTA: the mean SF-36 physical component scores were, respectively, 30.2 (SD = 11.4) and 37.8 (SD = 10.4) (P = 0.10); the mean Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment Survey scores were 44.2 (SD = 25.6) and 37.9 (SD = 21.5) (P = 0.50); the mean Ankle-Hindfoot Scale scores were 62.5 (SD = 19.6) and 65.8 (SD = 19.2), (P = 0.68); and the mean Visual Analogue Scale scores were 36.8 (SD = 34.7) and 36.0 (SD = 30.7) (P = 0.82). Conclusions: We were unable to demonstrate a significant difference between treating Sanders type IV fractures with either ORIF or ORIF + PSTA. It remains the choice of the surgeon and patient to take into account patient specific factors to determine treatment. However, ORIF + PSTA may be advantageous for both patients with Sanders type IV fractures and the health care system as patients heal quickly. Furthermore, ORIF + PSTA may prevent the need for late secondary subtalar fusion adding to increased costs and lost time from work.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 583
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial [J].
Agren, Per-Henrik ;
Wretenberg, Per ;
Sayed-Noor, Arkan S. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (15) :1351-1357
[2]
An economic evaluation of operative compared with nonoperative management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures [J].
Brauer, CA ;
Manns, BJ ;
Ko, M ;
Donaldson, C ;
Buckley, R .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (12) :2741-2749
[3]
Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of displacedintra-articular calcaneal fractures - A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial [J].
Buckley, R ;
Tough, S ;
McCormack, R ;
Pate, G ;
Leighton, R ;
Petrie, D ;
Galpin, R .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (10) :1733-1744
[4]
Buckley R E, 1992, J Orthop Trauma, V6, P216, DOI 10.1097/00005131-199206000-00014
[5]
Chahal D, 2006, J ORTHOP TRAUMA, V20, P555
[6]
Clare MP., 2004, Tech Foot Ankle Surg, V3, P250, DOI [10.1097/00132587-200412000-00011, DOI 10.1097/00132587-200412000-00011]
[7]
Cohen J., 1977, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
[8]
Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures - Variables predicting late subtalar fusion [J].
Csizy, M ;
Buckley, R ;
Tough, S ;
Leighton, R ;
Smith, J ;
McCormack, R ;
Pate, G ;
Petrie, D ;
Galpin, R .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2003, 17 (02) :106-112
[9]
PRIMARY FUSION OF THE POSTERIOR SUBTALAR JOINT IN THE TREATMENT OF FRACTURES OF THE CALCANEUM [J].
DICK, IL .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1953, 35 (03) :375-380
[10]
Management of calcaneal fractures: systematic review of randomized trials [J].
Gougoulias, Nikolaos ;
Khanna, Anil ;
McBride, Donald J. ;
Maffulli, Nicola .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2009, 92 (01) :153-167