The safety and tolerability of cyclosporine emulsion versus cyclosporine in a randomized, double-blind comparison in primary renal allograft recipients

被引:42
作者
Barone, G
Bunke, CM
Choc, MG
Hricik, DE
Jin, JHJ
Klein, JB
Marsh, CL
Min, DI
Pescovitz, MD
Pollak, R
Pruett, TL
Stinson, JB
Thompson, JS
Vasquez, E
Waid, T
Wombolt, DG
Wong, RL
机构
[1] UNIV ILLINOIS,SCH DENT,DIV TRANSPLANTAT,CHICAGO,IL 60612
[2] UNIV ARKANSAS,DEPT VASC & TRANSPLANT SURG,NEORAL STUDY GRP,LITTLE ROCK,AR 72204
[3] UNIV LOUISVILLE,JEWISH HOSP,KIDNEY DIS PROGRAM,LOUISVILLE,KY 40292
[4] UNIV WASHINGTON,MED CTR,DIV TRANSPLANTAT,SEATTLE,WA 98195
[5] UNIV IOWA HOSP & CLIN,COLL PHARM,IOWA CITY,IA 52242
[6] INDIANA UNIV,DEPT SURG & MICROBIOL IMMUNOL,INDIANAPOLIS,IN 46204
[7] UNIV ILLINOIS,DEPT PHARM PRACTICE,CHICAGO,IL
[8] UNIV VIRGINIA,HLTH SCI CTR,CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA
[9] LATTER DAY ST HOSP,RENAL TRANSPLANT DEPT,SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84143
[10] UNIV KENTUCKY,MED CTR,DEPT MED,LEXINGTON,KY 40506
[11] UNIV KENTUCKY,MED CTR,DEPT NEPHROL,LEXINGTON,KY 40506
[12] EASTERN VIRGINIA MED SCH,NORFOLK,VA 23501
[13] UNIV ARKANSAS MED SCI HOSP,DEPT VASC & TRANSPLANT SURG,LITTLE ROCK,AR 72205
[14] UNIV ARKANSAS MED SCI HOSP,DEPT NEPHROL,LITTLE ROCK,AR 72205
[15] UNIV HOSP CLEVELAND,TRANSPLANT SERV,CLEVELAND,OH
[16] UNIV ILLINOIS,COLL PHARM,DEPT PHARM PRACTICE,CHICAGO,IL
[17] SANDOZ PHARMACEUT CORP,SANDOZ RES INST,DRUG SAFETY BIOMED OPERAT & CLIN RES,E HANOVER,NJ
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007890-199603270-00021
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter pharmacokinetic study was conducted to compare the clinical safety and tolerability of cyclosporine capsules and oral solution for microemulsion and cyclosporine in 101 primary renal transplant recipients. Cyclosporine emulsion has more complete absorption and improved bioavailability compared with cyclosporine, and dosing of both cyclosporine formulations was adjusted to achieve comparable whole-blood trough levels, Mean serum creatinine values were higher in the cyclosporine emulsion group at baseline, 8, and 12 weeks (P<0.05), The incidence of acute rejection was similar in both treatment groups although fewer patients required monoclonal antibody therapy in the cyclosporine emulsion group than in the cyclosporine group (31% vs, 82%, respectively). Despite the increased bioavailability of cyclosporine emulsion, no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events were observed; the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of cyclosporine emulsion and cyclosporine were comparable.
引用
收藏
页码:968 / 970
页数:3
相关论文
共 6 条