How does wing length relate to distribution patterns of stoneflies (Plecoptera) and mayflies (Ephemeroptera)?

被引:75
作者
Malmqvist, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Ecol & Environm Sci, SE-90187 Umea, Sweden
关键词
rarity; aquatic insects; wing length; occupancy; range size;
D O I
10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00139-1
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Short wings, and hence a potential for reduced dispersal capacity, can be one of several reasons for rarity in freshwater insects. To test this hypothesis, I compared wing lengths, standardised for body length differences, of stoneflies and mayflies based on published Swedish material. Taking 25% presence as the limit between rare and not rare, rare species indeed had shorter wings than those that were classified as not rare. Wing length was not the sole explanation for rarity as seen in the presence of rare species along the entire range of wing to body lengths. In both stoneflies and mayflies wing lengths were positively related to range sizes. Occupancy showed a positive relationship with wing size in mayflies, whereas in stoneflies the relationship was not significant, probably because there was no difference in wing lengths over a range of occupancy values in the common species. Implications for conservation include the importance to identify poor dispersers among these groups and describe their habitats, since it can be expected that recolonisation by poor flyers can be very uncertain and slow after local extinction. Therefore, localities with rare, poorly-dispersing species should be protected but if extinction occurs, re-introduction might offer a possibility to re-establish such insects. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 276
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   INSECT DISPERSAL ON TENERIFE, CANARY-ISLANDS - HIGH-ALTITUDE FALLOUT AND SEAWARD DRIFT [J].
ASHMOLE, NP ;
ASHMOLE, MJ .
ARCTIC AND ALPINE RESEARCH, 1988, 20 (01) :1-12
[2]  
Bengtsson S., 1914, Entomologisk Tidskrift Uppsala, V35
[3]  
Bengtsson S., 1917, Entomologisk Tidskrift Uppsala, V38
[4]  
Bengtsson Simon, 1912, Entomologisk Tidskrift Stockholm, V33
[5]  
Brinck P., 1949, OPUSCULA ENTOMOLOG S, V11, P1
[6]   BIOLOGY OF MAYFLIES [J].
BRITTAIN, JE .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 1982, 27 :119-147
[7]   Dispersal and recruitment in streams: Evidence from genetic studies [J].
Bunn, SE ;
Hughes, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN BENTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1997, 16 (02) :338-346
[8]   PATTERNS IN MAYFLY (EPHEMEROPTERA) WING LENGTH - ADAPTATION TO DISPERSAL [J].
CORKUM, LD .
CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST, 1987, 119 (09) :783-790
[9]  
DEGERMAN E, 4345 NAT ENV PROT AG