Explaining the appearance and success of voter referenda for open-space conservation

被引:83
作者
Kotchen, Matthew J. [1 ]
Powers, Shawn M.
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Econ, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Williams Coll, Dept Econ, Williamstown, MA 01267 USA
关键词
open-space; land conservation; voter referenda;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2006.02.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper provides an empirical investigation of the factors that influence the appearance and success of voter referenda to raise public funds for open-space conservation. We take advantage of a data set that includes detailed information on all such referenda that occurred in the United States between 1998 and 2003. Combining these data with information from the U.S. Census and state-specific variables, we conduct a nationwide analysis along with focused studies of referenda that occurred in New Jersey and Massachusetts. The paper provides the first investigation of how funding mechanisms and funding rates affect voter support for public acquisition of open space. We also provide evidence on the relationship between existing patterns of open space and voter support for open-space referenda. As open-space initiatives continue to gain popularity at the ballot box, the descriptive insights of this paper should prove useful for both policy-makers and advocates working in the area of land use management. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 390
页数:18
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   The public demand for open space: The case of Connecticut communities [J].
Bates, LJ ;
Santerre, RE .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2001, 50 (01) :97-111
[2]   Using contingent valuation to estimate a neighbourhood's willingness to pay to preserve undeveloped urban land [J].
Breffle, WS ;
Morey, ER ;
Lodder, TS .
URBAN STUDIES, 1998, 35 (04) :715-727
[3]   Contingent valuation and incentives [J].
Champ, PA ;
Flores, NE ;
Brown, TC ;
Chivers, J .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2002, 78 (04) :591-604
[4]  
DEACON R, 1975, AM ECON REV, V65, P943
[5]  
Dubin J. A., 1992, Economics Politics, V4, P191, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.1992.tb00062.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0343.1992.TB00062.X]
[6]   DETERMINANTS OF VOTING ON ENVIRONMENTAL-QUALITY - STUDY OF A NEW-HAMPSHIRE PULP-MILL REFERENDUM [J].
FISCHEL, WA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1979, 6 (02) :107-118
[7]  
Greene W.H., 2000, ECONOMETRIC ANAL
[8]  
HALVORSEN R, 1980, AM ECON REV, V70, P474
[9]   What are the determinants of open-space ballot measures? An extension of the research [J].
Howell-Moroney, M .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2004, 85 (01) :169-179
[10]   The effects of open space on residential property values [J].
Irwin, EG .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2002, 78 (04) :465-480