Effect of Two Bioabsorbable Barrier Membranes on Bone Regeneration of Standardized Defects in Calvarial Bone: A Comparative Histomorphometric Study in Pigs

被引:22
作者
Bornstein, Michael M. [1 ]
Heynen, Guy [2 ]
Bosshardt, Dieter D. [1 ]
Buser, Daniel
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral Surg & Stomatol, Lab Oral Histol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Creativenture, Zug, Switzerland
关键词
Biomaterials; bone regeneration; collagen; cross-linking; membranes; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; NON-BIODEGRADABLE MEMBRANES; LINKED COLLAGEN MEMBRANES; BIORESORBABLE BARRIER; RIDGE AUGMENTATION; BOVINE BONE; NONRESORBABLE MEMBRANES; AUTOGENOUS BONE; CROSS-LINKING; IMPLANTS;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2009.090075
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
100302 [口腔临床医学];
摘要
Background: The effect of two different bioabsorbable collagen membranes on bone regeneration was assessed in standardized, membrane-protected calvarial defects in pigs. Methods: Two standardized defect types (6 x 6 x 6 mm and 9 x 9 x 9 mm) were produced in the calvaria of pigs: empty defects without a membrane (group 1; eight defects per size); defects filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) without a membrane (group 2; eight defects per size); defects filled with DBBM and covered by a collagen membrane (group 3; eight defects per size); and defects filled with DBBM and covered by a cross-linked collagen membrane (CCM) (group 4; eight defects per size). Sacrifice took place 16 weeks after surgery, and the following parameters were analyzed: descriptive histology; semiquantitative histology (SQH), assessing bone regeneration in the whole defect area; and histomorphometric analysis of the percentage of bone and DBBM in the regenerated area at three different depth levels of the defect. Results: Using SQH, both membrane types resulted in significantly better bone regeneration compared to groups 1 and 2, irrespective of the defect size (P <0.005), with no difference between the two membranes. In the histomorphometric analysis, the layer immediately below the surface exhibited a significantly higher percentage of bone in groups 3 (27%) and 4 (36%) versus the two other groups for the 9 x 9 x 9-mm defects. No such differences were apparent for the 6 x 6 x 6-mm defects or the other two depth levels (bottom and middle layer) for either defect size. Conclusions: The two collagen membranes tested significantly enhanced bone regeneration, especially in the superficial level of the calvarial bone defects. The prototype CCM did not provide any further advantage in the present animal model. J Periodontol 2009;80:1289-1299.
引用
收藏
页码:1289 / 1299
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]
Osseointegration of subperiosteal implants using bovine bone substitute and various membranes [J].
Aaboe, M ;
Schou, S ;
Hjorting-Hansen, E ;
Helbo, M ;
Vikjaer, D .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2000, 11 (01) :51-58
[2]
Becker W, 1999, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V1, P27, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00088.x
[3]
A COMPARISON OF EPTFE MEMBRANES ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH PLATELET-DERIVED GROWTH-FACTORS AND INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR-I OR DEMINERALIZED FREEZE-DRIED BONE IN PROMOTING BONE-FORMATION AROUND IMMEDIATE EXTRACTION SOCKET IMPLANTS [J].
BECKER, W ;
LYNCH, SE ;
LEKHOLM, U ;
BECKER, BE ;
CAFFESSE, R ;
DONATH, K ;
SANCHEZ, R .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1992, 63 (11) :929-940
[4]
Effect of two different bioabsorbable collagen membranes on guided bone regeneration: A comparative histomorphometric study in the dog mandible [J].
Bornstein, Michael M. ;
Bosshardt, Dieter ;
Buser, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2007, 78 (10) :1943-1953
[5]
Regeneration of rat calvarial defects using a bioabsorbable membrane technique: Influence of collagen cross-linking [J].
Brunel, G ;
Piantoni, P ;
Elharar, F ;
Benque, E ;
Marin, P ;
Zahedi, S .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1996, 67 (12) :1342-1348
[6]
Collagen membranes: A review [J].
Bunyaratavej, P ;
Wang, HL .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (02) :215-229
[7]
BUSER D, 1995, INT J PERIODONT REST, V15, P11
[8]
Evaluation of filling materials in membrane-protected bone defects - A comparative histomorphometric study in the mandible of miniature pigs [J].
Buser, D ;
Hoffmann, B ;
Bernard, JP ;
Lussi, A ;
Mettler, D ;
Schenk, RK .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (03) :137-150
[9]
Buser D, 1995, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V10, P666
[10]
Buser D, 1993, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, V13, P29