Scrapie epidemic in a fully PrP-genotyped sheep flock

被引:75
作者
Baylis, M [1 ]
Goldmann, W
Houston, F
Cairns, D
Chong, A
Ross, A
Smith, A
Hunter, N
McLean, AR
机构
[1] Inst Anim Hlth, Newbury RG20 7NN, Berks, England
[2] Inst Anim Hlth, Neuropathogenesis Unit, Edinburgh EH9 3JF, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Dept Zool, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
关键词
D O I
10.1099/0022-1317-83-11-2907
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In scrapie-affected sheep flocks, host PrP genotype plays a vital role in determining which sheep will succumb to scrapie and the incubation period. Consequently, within-flock scrapie dynamics is best understood within the context of the genotype profile of the flock. Here we describe a 17 month epidemic of scrapie in a commercially farmed flock of 230 genotyped Texel sheep. At the start of the study, 70% of the sheep were of three genotypes only: ARR/ARQ, ARH/ARQ and ARQ/ARQ. Only 15% of sheep encoded the disease-associated VRQ allele and only a single sheep (0.4%) was of the most susceptible VRQ/VRQ genotype. For susceptible genotypes there was a marked deficit (P<0.025) of older animals (greater than or equal to, 3 years), implying that some cases of scrapie had occurred previously. In the ensuing 17 months, 18 sheep of known genotype were confirmed positive for the disease: seven VRQ/ARQ, six VRQ/ARH, two VRQ/ARR, three ARQ/ARQ. Median ages at death were 2.7, 2.8, 4.2 and 3.8 years respectively. Mortality rates were 55, 86, 13 and 3% respectively. Survival analysis revealed a highly significant effect of genotype on survivorship, but no difference between VRQ/ARQ and VRQ/ARH, or between VRQ/ARR and ARQ/ARQ. There was no difference in the survivorship of middle- and older-age cohorts of susceptible sheep. Scrapie risk group (as defined by PrP genotype) was not associated with submission as a scrapie suspect but later found to be negative, or with dying of unknown causes on the farm.
引用
收藏
页码:2907 / 2914
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Allison PD, 1995, Survival analysis using sas: A practical guide, V2nd
[2]   The signature of scrapie: differences in the PrP genotype profile of scrapie-affected and scrapie-free UK sheep flocks [J].
Baylis, M ;
Houston, F ;
Goldmann, W ;
Hunter, N ;
McLean, AR .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 267 (1457) :2029-2035
[3]   IDENTIFICATION OF 5 ALLELIC VARIANTS OF THE SHEEP PRP GENE AND THEIR ASSOCIATION WITH NATURAL SCRAPIE [J].
BELT, PBGM ;
MUILEMAN, IH ;
SCHREUDER, BEC ;
BOSDERUIJTER, J ;
GIELKENS, ALJ ;
SMITS, MA .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY, 1995, 76 :509-517
[4]   SCRAPIE-ASSOCIATED FIBRILS IN FOUND DEAD SHEEP [J].
CLARK, AM ;
DAWSON, M ;
SCOTT, AC .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1994, 134 (25) :650-651
[5]  
Collett D, 2014, MODELLING SURVIVAL D
[6]  
Dawson M, 1998, VET REC, V142, P623
[7]  
*DEFRA, 2001, NAT SCRAP PLAN GREAT, P28
[8]   Genetic susceptibility and transmission factors in scrapie: detailed analysis of an epidemic in a closed flock of Romanov [J].
Elsen, JM ;
Amigues, Y ;
Schelcher, F ;
Ducrocq, V ;
Andreoletti, O ;
Eychenne, F ;
Khang, JVT ;
Poivey, JP ;
Lantier, F ;
Laplanche, JL .
ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 1999, 144 (03) :431-445
[9]   PRP GENOTYPE AND AGENT EFFECTS IN SCRAPIE - CHANGE IN ALLELIC INTERACTION WITH DIFFERENT ISOLATES OF AGENT IN SHEEP, A NATURAL HOST OF SCRAPIE [J].
GOLDMANN, W ;
HUNTER, N ;
SMITH, G ;
FOSTER, J ;
HOPE, J .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY, 1994, 75 :989-995
[10]  
HUNTER M, 1997, GENETICS SHEEP, P225