Is the Motherhood Penalty Larger for Low-Wage Women? A Comment on Quantile Regression

被引:117
作者
Killewald, Alexandra [1 ]
Bearak, Jonathan [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] NYU, New York, NY 10003 USA
关键词
quantile regression; working parents; family; quantitative methods; earnings;
D O I
10.1177/0003122414524574
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
In this comment, we offer a nontechnical discussion of conventional (conditional) multivariate quantile regression, with an emphasis on the appropriate interpretation of results. We discuss its distinction from unconditional quantile regression, an analytic method that can be used to estimate varying associations between predictors and outcome at different points of the outcome distribution. We argue that the research question posed by Budig and Hodges (2010)-whether the motherhood penalty is larger for low-wage women-cannot be answered with the authors' conditional quantile regression models. Using more appropriate unconditional quantile regression models, we find, in contrast to Budig and Hodges's claims, that the motherhood penalty is not largest for low-wage women.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 357
页数:8
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   Differences in Disadvantage: Variation in the Motherhood Penalty across White Women's Earnings Distribution [J].
Budig, Michelle J. ;
Hodges, Melissa J. .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2010, 75 (05) :705-728
[2]   Heterogeneous impacts in PROGRESA [J].
Djebbari, Habiba ;
Smith, Jeffrey .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2008, 145 (1-2) :64-80
[3]   Unconditional Quantile Regressions [J].
Firpo, Sergio ;
Fortin, Nicole M. ;
Lemieux, Thomas .
ECONOMETRICA, 2009, 77 (03) :953-973
[4]  
Gary Chamberlain, 1994, ADV EC 6 WORLD C, V1, P171
[5]  
Hao L, 2007, QUANTILE REGRESSION
[6]   Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Exploring the early grades and the extremes [J].
Penner, Andrew M. ;
Paret, Marcel .
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2008, 37 (01) :239-253
[7]  
Roger K., 2005, QUANTILE REGRESSION