Solar radiation models. Part 2: Comparison and developing new models

被引:61
作者
Ulgen, K [1 ]
Hepbasli, A
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Solar Energy Inst, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Izmir, Turkey
来源
ENERGY SOURCES | 2004年 / 26卷 / 05期
关键词
clearness index; correlation models; empirical models; global and diffuse radiation; solar radiation; solar radiation models; solar energy system; model comparison; Turkey;
D O I
10.1080/00908310490429704
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Solar engineers, architects, agriculturists, and hydrologists in many applications of solar energy require a reasonably accurate knowledge about the availability of solar resources at any place. For this purpose, in the past, several empirical models have been developed in order to estimate the solar radiation around the world. The main objective of the present study is twofold, namely: (1) to compare some existing models used for estimating the monthly average daily global solar radiation on a horizontal surface (H) for Turkey's big cities such as Istanbul, Ankara and Izmir which cover approximately 30% of the population of Turkey, and (2) to develop some empirical models for these cities. Experimental data for Izmir were measured in the Solar-Meteorological Station of the Solar Energy Institute at Ege University. The present models were then compared with the 25 models, of which 12 were given in Part I of this study (defined as national models), while the remainder (called international models), presented here, and used for calculating H. The main percentage error (MPE), the root mean square error (RMSE), the main bias error (MBE) and the t-statistic (t-stat) methods were used for evaluating the performance of the models studied. It may be concluded that the present models predict the values of H for the three big cities better than other available models.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 530
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Angstrom A., 1924, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, V50, P121, DOI DOI 10.1002/QJ.49705021008
[2]   ESTIMATION OF DAILY AND MONTHLY DIRECT, DIFFUSE AND GLOBAL SOLAR-RADIATION FROM SUNSHINE DURATION MEASUREMENTS [J].
BENSON, RB ;
PARIS, MV ;
SHERRY, JE ;
JUSTUS, CG .
SOLAR ENERGY, 1984, 32 (04) :523-535
[3]  
DOGNIAUX R, 1983, SOLAR ENERGY R D E F, V2, P94
[4]   Correlationships between clearness index and relative sunshine duration for Sudan [J].
Elagib, NA ;
Alvi, SH ;
Mansell, MG .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 1999, 17 (04) :473-498
[5]   Comparison of some existing models for estimating global solar radiation for Antalya (Turkey) [J].
Ertekin, C ;
Yaldiz, O .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 41 (04) :311-330
[6]  
GLOWER J, 1958, Q J R MET SOC, V84, P172
[7]  
Gopinathan K. K., 1988, Solar & Wind Technology, V5, P581, DOI 10.1016/0741-983X(88)90050-1
[9]  
Hepbasli A, 2001, ENERG SOURCE, V23, P631, DOI 10.1080/00908310152004737
[10]  
KHOLAGI A, 1983, SOL ENERGY, V31, P55