Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter

被引:159
作者
Uswatte, G
Miltner, WHR
Foo, B
Varma, M
Moran, S
Taub, E
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Psychol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Jena, Dept Biol & Clin Psychol, D-6900 Jena, Germany
关键词
arm; monitoring; ambulatory; rehabilitation; treatment outcome;
D O I
10.1161/01.STR.31.3.662
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-The consensus is that the most important outcome for rehabilitation is functional activity in the life situation. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy, a new treatment that transfers in-clinic gains to the life situation, demands objective measurement of real-world movement. However, direct, objective, and accurate measures of arm use in the real world are not available. Previous attempts to use accelerometry to measure extremity movement have failed because of unacceptable variability. This problem has been addressed here by use of a threshold filter. Methods-Nine stroke patients and 1 healthy individual wearing accelerometers were videotaped while they carried out their usual activities at home or in the clinic; the duration of their arm, torso, and ambulatory movements was judged by 2 observation teams. In addition, Il college students performed 5 standardized activities of daily living for varying durations in the laboratory. The accelerometer data were transformed; the raw value recorded for a given epoch was set to a constant if it exceeded a low threshold. Results-The threshold-filtered recordings measured the duration of movement accurately and with very little variability. Correlations between the threshold-filtered recordings and the observer ratings of the duration of arm, torso, and ambulatory movements were 0.93, 0.93 and 0.99, respectively; the corresponding correlations for the raw values were -0.17, 0.34, and 0.85. Conclusions-These results present initial evidence for the validity of threshold-filtered accelerometer recordings for objectively measuring the amount of real-world upper-extremity movement as an index of treatment outcome for rehabilitation patients.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 667
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] STROKE RECOVERY - HE CAN BUT DOES HE
    ANDREWS, K
    STEWART, J
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY AND REHABILITATION, 1979, 18 (01): : 43 - 48
  • [2] Validity and reliability of measurements obtained with an "activity monitor" in people with and without a transtibial amputation
    Bussmann, HBJ
    Reuvekamp, PJ
    Veltink, PH
    Martens, WLJ
    Stam, HJ
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1998, 78 (09): : 989 - 998
  • [3] Duncan P W, 1997, Top Stroke Rehabil, V3, P1, DOI 10.1080/10749357.1997.11754126
  • [4] Assessment of posture and motion by multichannel piezoresistive accelerometer recordings
    Fahrenberg, J
    Foerster, F
    Smeja, M
    Muller, W
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 34 (05) : 607 - 612
  • [5] The emerging science of functional assessment: Our tool for outcomes analysis
    Granger, CV
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1998, 79 (03): : 235 - 240
  • [6] Relation of accelerometer and EMG recordings for the measurement of upper extremity movement
    Keil, A
    Elbert, T
    Taub, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) : 77 - 82
  • [7] CONCEPTUAL BASIS OF OUTCOME MEASURES
    KEITH, RA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1995, 74 (01) : 73 - 80
  • [8] Recognition of daily life motor activity classes using an artificial neural network
    Kiani, K
    Snijders, CJ
    Gelsema, ES
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1998, 79 (02): : 147 - 154
  • [9] The reliability, validity, and stability of a measure of physical activity in the elderly
    Kochersberger, G
    McConnell, E
    Kuchibhatla, MN
    Pieper, C
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1996, 77 (08): : 793 - 795
  • [10] OBSERVATIONS ON THE DESIGN AND SPECIFICATION OF A WRIST-WORN HUMAN ACTIVITY MONITORING-SYSTEM
    REDMOND, DP
    HEGGE, FW
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 1985, 17 (06): : 659 - 669