Quantitative and morphological assessment of early gestational sacs using three-dimensional ultrasonography

被引:22
作者
Lee, W.
Deter, R. L.
McNie, B.
Powell, M.
Balasubramaniam, M.
Goncalves, L. F.
Espinoza, J.
Romero, R.
机构
[1] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Fetal Imaging, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
[2] NICHD, DHHS, Perinatol Res Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] NICHD, DHHS, Perinatol Res Branch, NIH, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hutzel Womens Hosp, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] William Beaumont Hosp, Res Inst, Div Biostat, Royal Oak, MI USA
关键词
first trimester; sac volume; three-dimensional ultrasonography; VOCAL;
D O I
10.1002/uog.2840
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 [声学]; 082403 [水声工程];
摘要
Objective Our main objective was to determine the value of three-dimensional ultrasonograpby (3DUS) and Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL (TM)) in the evaluation of gestational sac volume and morphology during early pregnancy. Methods Twenty-eight normal early pregnancies were scanned approximately every 2 weeks using transabdominal (TAS) and transvaginal (TVS) sonography. The VOCAL technique was used to create computerized surface models to classify gestational sac shapes as discoid or ellipsoid. Serial sac volume changes were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Bland-Altman plots determined examiner bias and limits of agreement (LOA) for sac volume measurements. Gestational sac volumes were compared between the two-dimensional (2D) ellipsoid and VOCAL techniques. Differences between volume measurements were tested using the two-tailed paired t-test witb statistical significance at the P < 0.05 level. Results Each subject was examined at a mean SD menstrual age of 7.9 +/- 0.6 weeks (Scan 1), 9.9 +/- 0.6 weeks (Scan 2), and 11.9 +/- 0.6 weeks (Scan 3). Sac volumes significantly increased over time from 22 +/- 11 mL at Scan 1, to S7 +/- 21 mL at Scan 2 and 116 +/- 3SmL at Scan 3 (P < 0.001). Predominant sac shapes were classified as ellipsoid (76.2%) or discoid (23.8%). Additional descriptors included: concave (60.7%), irregular (53.6%), or smooth (7.1%), with 19% of the overall group having more than one additional shape attribute. Clinically acceptable volume measurement bias and agreement were found for the following comparisons: (1) TAS versus TVS; (2) interobserver volume measurements; and (3) intraobserver volume measurements. The VOCAL technique yielded slightly greater sac volumes (64 +/- 45.4 mL) when compared to the 2D ellipsoid model (48.6 +/- 36.8 mL) (28.9 +/- 24.3% (95% limit of agreement range, -18.7 to 76.5%), P < 0.001). Conclusions Reproducible sac volume measurements can be obtained using VOCAL with either TAS or TVS. Early gestational sacs variably appear as discoid or ellipsoid structures with a concave indentation from the placenta. Sac volumes can be underestimated if an ellipsoid shape is assumed. Morphological and quantitative analysis-of the gestational sac may provide baseline parameters for studying patients at risk for early pregnancy failure. Copyright (c) 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 260
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
First-trimester, three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound volumetry in normal pregnancies and spontaneous miscarriages [J].
Acharya, G ;
Morgan, H .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 19 (06) :575-579
[2]
Three-dimensional measurement of gestational and yolk sac volumes as predictors of pregnancy outcome in the first trimester [J].
Babinszki, A ;
Nyari, T ;
Jordan, S ;
Nasseri, A ;
Mukherjee, T ;
Copperman, AB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2001, 18 (04) :203-211
[3]
The growth of the human embryo. A longitudinal biometric assessment from 7 to 12 weeks of gestation [J].
Blaas, HG ;
Eik-Nes, SH ;
Bremnes, JB .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 12 (05) :346-354
[4]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]
Reproducibility of transvaginal three-dimensional endometrial volume measurements with virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) during ovarian stimulation [J].
Bordes, A ;
Bory, AM ;
Benchaïb, M ;
Rudigoz, RC ;
Salle, B .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 19 (01) :76-80
[6]
SMALL SAC SIZE IN THE 1ST TRIMESTER - A PREDICTOR OF POOR FETAL-OUTCOME [J].
BROMLEY, B ;
HARLOW, BL ;
LABODA, LA ;
BENACERRAF, BR .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (02) :375-377
[7]
ULTRASONIC PLANIMETRY OF GESTATION SAC AS A BIOMETRIC METHOD IN EARLY-PREGNANCY [J].
BULIC, M ;
VRTAR, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1978, 6 (04) :228-232
[8]
CUZZI JC, 1980, MIKROSKOPIE, V37, P61
[9]
Sonography of pregnancies with first-trimester bleeding and a viable embryo: A study of prognostic indicators by logistic regression analysis [J].
Falco, P ;
Milano, V ;
Pilu, G ;
David, C ;
Grisolia, G ;
Rizzo, N ;
Bovicelli, L .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 7 (03) :165-169
[10]
Gestational sac volume measured by three-dimensional ultrasound at 11 to 13+6 weeks of gestation: relation to chromosomal defects [J].
Falcon, O ;
Wegrzyn, P ;
Faro, C ;
Peralta, CFA ;
Nicolaides, KH .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 25 (06) :546-550