A retrospective case study to assess the value of the implantable loop recorder for the investigation of undiagnosed syncope

If not diagnosed by history, examination, or ECG, the diagnosis of syncope can be difficult with a low yield from echocardiography, ambulatory ECG recording, electrophysiological study, and tilt table testing. During 2 years, 48 patients with unexplained syncope or presyncope from three hospitals in one city underwent the implantation of a Medtronic Reveal implantable loop recorder capable of cardiac monitoring for 14 months. All patients had at least two prior episodes of syncope or presyncope. Fifty-two percent of patients had electrophysiological studies, all of which were negative. The implantable loop recorder remained implanted until a diagnostic event was recorded, or until the end of the battery life. After a mean follow-up of 5.6 +/- 5.7 months, symptoms reoccurred in 25 (52.1%) patients at a mean of 2.8 +/- 2.1 months after insertion of an implantable loop recorder. No further symptoms occurred in 23 (47.9%) patients. Of the 25 patients who had a symptom and recorded an event, an arrhythmia was seen in 10 (40%) patients. Seven patients had bradycardia; 4 with profound sinus bradycardia/sinus arrest, 1 with complete heart block, and 2 in association with the cardioinhibitory component of vasovagal syncope. Three patients had tachycardias; two with supraventricular tachycardia and one with atrial flutter. Fifteen (60%) of the 25 patients who activated their device due to syncope or presyncope were in sinus rhythm during the event. The implantable loop recorder was effective in making a cardiological or noncardiological diagnosis for unexplained syncope or presyncope in 52.1% of the patients.