Item- and task-level processes in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: positive and negative correlates of encoding

被引:49
作者
Reynolds, JR
Donaldson, DI
Wagner, AD
Braver, TS
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, St Louis, MO 63139 USA
[2] Univ Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
left inferior prefrontal cortex; functional magnetic resonance imaging; task-level processes;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.033
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Activity in the left inferior prefrontal cortex (LIPC) is often thought to reflect processes that support episodic encoding. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to test whether processes subserved by LIPC could be negatively related to subsequent memory performance. Specifically, the current experiment explicitly tested the hypothesis that LIPC processing would positively impact encoding when primarily focused towards specific target items (item-level processing), whereas it would negatively impact encoding when primarily focused on the retrieval and instantiation of current task instructions (task-level processing). Two methods were used to identify regions that were sensitive to the two types of processes: a block-level manipulation of encoding task that influenced subsequent memory, and a back-sort procedure. LIPC was sensitive to item- and task-level processing, but not in a way that always facilitates encoding. LIPC was more active for subsequently remembered words than subsequently forgotten words, but it was also more active in a task that emphasized task-level processing relative to a task that emphasized item-level processing, although this former condition led to poorer subsequent memory performance. This pattern indicates that processes subserved by LIPC are not always positively correlated with episodic encoding. Rather, LIPC processes can support both the controlled semantic processing of items and the controlled retrieval of relevant semantic task context. When devoted to the latter, the diversion of LIPC processes to the task level can have a negative consequence for item-level analysis and encoding. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1472 / 1483
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   The effects of divided attention on encoding- and retrieval-related brain activity: A PET study of younger and older adults [J].
Anderson, ND ;
Iidaka, T ;
Cabeza, R ;
Kapur, S ;
McIntosh, AR ;
Craik, FIM .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 12 (05) :775-792
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1983, CANADIAN PSYCHOL
[3]  
Badre David, 2002, Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, V1, P206, DOI 10.1177/1534582302001003002
[4]   Neural correlates of verbal memory encoding during semantic and structural processing tasks [J].
Baker, JT ;
Sanders, AL ;
Maccotta, L ;
Buckner, RL .
NEUROREPORT, 2001, 12 (06) :1251-1256
[5]   Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching [J].
Braver, TS ;
Reynolds, JR ;
Donaldson, DI .
NEURON, 2003, 39 (04) :713-726
[6]   Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors [J].
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Gray, JR ;
Molfese, DL ;
Snyder, A .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2001, 11 (09) :825-836
[7]   The role of frontopolar cortex in subgoal processing during working memory [J].
Braver, TS ;
Bongiolatti, SR .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 15 (03) :523-536
[8]   Direct comparison of prefrontal cortex regions engaged by working and long-term memory tasks [J].
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Kelley, WM ;
Buckner, RL ;
Cohen, NJ ;
Miezin, FM ;
Snyder, AZ ;
Ollinger, JM ;
Akbudak, E ;
Conturo, TE ;
Petersen, SE .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (01) :48-59
[9]   Making memories: Brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered [J].
Brewer, JB ;
Zhao, Z ;
Desmond, JE ;
Glover, GH ;
Gabrieli, JDE .
SCIENCE, 1998, 281 (5380) :1185-1187
[10]   The cognitive neuroscience of remembering [J].
Randy L. Buckner ;
Mark E. Wheeler .
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2001, 2 (9) :624-634