Mechanisms for vasopressin effects on intraocular pressure in anesthetized rats

被引:5
作者
Balaban, CD
Palm, DE
Shikher, V
Searles, RV
Keil, LC
Severs, WB
机构
[1] PENN STATE UNIV,COLL MED,MILTON S HERSHEY MED CTR,DEPT PHARMACOL,HERSHEY,PA 17033
[2] NASA,AMES RES CTR,MOFFETT FIELD,CA 94035
[3] UNIV PITTSBURGH,INST EYE & EAR,DEPT PHARMACOL,PITTSBURGH,PA 15213
关键词
rat; intraocular pressure; arginine vasopressin; intracameral injection; outflow resistance;
D O I
10.1006/exer.1997.0346
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Continuous intracameral infusions of a balanced salt solution (0.175 mu l min(-1)) have been reported to raise intraocular pressure (IOP) in anesthetized rats. Palm et al. (1995) previously reported that this effect was attenuated significantly by inclusion of arginine-vasopressin (AVP, 10 ng 0.175 mu l(-1)) in the infusate. This study used experimental and computer simulation methods to investigate factors underlying these changes in IOP. First, constant intracameral infusions of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) at different fixed rates (0.049-0.35 mu l min(-1)) were used to estimate the outflow resistance. Secondly, IOP responses were measured during an 2 hr intracameral infusion of either aCSF or AVP that was the sum of a small constant component (0.05 mu l min(-1)) and a larger periodic component (0.25 mu l min(-1), cycling for 4 min on, then 4 min off); the mean infusion rate was 0.175 mu l min(-1). As shown previously for 0.175 mu l min(-1) constant infusions, the periodic aCSF infusion induced a significant rise in IOP that was attenuated by AVP administration. Complex demodulation analysis and the estimated gain parameter of a second order transfer function fit to the periodic responses indicated that outflow resistance increased significantly during the infusions in both aCSF and AVP groups, but that the indices of resistance did not differ significantly between aCSF and AVP infused eyes. This finding implies that changes in outflow resistance do not explain the difference in IOP responses to intracameral aCSF and AVP. The two responses differed significantly, though, in damping factors, such that the aCSF responses were considerably more underdamped than the AVP responses. It is hypothesized that aCSF-induced increase in IOP reflects both (1) a small component reflecting increased outflow resistance and (2) a larger non-resistive component. Since the non-resistive component is insensitive to pretreatment with acetazolamide, it is suggested that the aCSF-induced elevation in IOP reflects primarily vascular perfusion changes that are reduced by local vasoconstrictor actions of AVP. The latter mechanism likely maintains vascular perfusion of the globe when intraocular hypertension develops. (C) 1997 Academic Press Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 531
页数:15
相关论文
共 25 条
[2]  
BARANY EH, 1963, INVEST OPHTH VISUAL, V2, P584
[4]   BLOOD-CIRCULATION AND FLUID-DYNAMICS IN EYE [J].
BILL, A .
PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1975, 55 (03) :383-417
[6]  
BLOOMFIELD P, 1976, FOURIER ANAL TIME SE, P118
[7]  
BRUBAKER RF, 1970, INVEST OPHTH VISUAL, V9, P42
[8]  
CARLSON KH, 1987, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V28, P1346
[9]  
COLE DF, 1974, EYE, V6, P71
[10]  
DAVSON H, 1980, PHYSL OCULAR CEREBRO, P3