Costly myths: An analysis of idling beliefs and behavior in personal motor vehicles

被引:27
作者
Carrico, Amanda R. [1 ]
Padgett, Paul [2 ]
Vandenbergh, Michael P. [3 ]
Gilligan, Jonathan [4 ]
Wallston, Kenneth A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Owen Grad Sch Management, Vanderbilt Ctr Environm Management Studies, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Law, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Nursing, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
关键词
Idling; Climate change; Individual/household emissions; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.031
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite the large contribution of individuals and households to climate change, little has been done in the US to reduce the CO(2) emissions attributable to this sector. Motor vehicle idling among individual private citizens is one behavior that may be amenable to large-scale policy interventions. Currently, little data are available to quantify the potential reductions in emissions that could be realized by successful policy interventions. In addition, little is known about the motivations and beliefs that underlie idling. In the fall of 2007,1300 drivers in the US were surveyed to assess typical idling practices, beliefs and motivations. Results indicate that the average individual idled for over 16 min a day and believed that a vehicle can be idled for at least 3.6 min before it is better to turn it off. Those who held inaccurate beliefs idled, on average, over I min longer than the remainder of the sample. These data suggest that idling accounts for over 93 MMt of CO(2) and 10.6 billion gallons (40.1 billion liters) of gasoline a year, equaling 1.6% of all US emissions. Much of this idling is unnecessary and economically disadvantageous to drivers. The policy implications of these findings are discussed. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2881 / 2888
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
ALSON J, 2005, 420R05012 EPA
[2]  
[Anonymous], CONTRIBUTION WORKING
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT EN ANN 2006
[4]  
[Anonymous], INT EN ANN 2005
[5]   Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions [J].
Bin, S ;
Dowlatabadi, H .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (02) :197-208
[6]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[7]   Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research [J].
Conner, M ;
Armitage, CJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 28 (15) :1429-1464
[8]  
*ENV PROT AG, 2005, EPA420F05
[9]  
*ENV PROT AG, 2004, OMS18 ENV PROT AG
[10]  
*ENV PROT AG, 2006, EPA420B06004