Considerations for ethical practice in managed care

被引:24
作者
Acuff, C
Bennett, BE
Bricklin, PM
Canter, MB
Knapp, SJ
Moldawsky, S
Phelps, R
机构
[1] Ctr Mental Hlth Serv, Rockville, MD USA
[2] Widener Univ, Chester, PA 19013 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0735-7028.30.6.563
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
How does one maintain an ethical practice while facing the requirements and limits of a health care system that is dominated by managed care? Psychologists are increasingly raising such questions about ethical issues when working in or contracting with managed care organizations. The authors review the process involved in ethical decision making and problem solving and focus on 4 areas in which ethical dilemmas most commonly arise in a managed care context: informed consent, confidentiality, abandonment, and utilization management-utilization review. The need for sustained and organized advocacy efforts to ensure patient access to quality health care is discussed as is the impact of managed care's competitive marketplace on professional relationships. Hypothetical examples of typical dilemmas psychologists face in the current practice environment are provided to illustrate systematic ethical decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 575
页数:13
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
*AM PSYCH ASS BOAR, 1998, PROBL LIM US PSYCH 2
[2]  
*AM PSYCH ASS BOAR, 1990, GUID PROV PSYCH SERV
[3]  
*AM PSYCH ASS BOAR, 1998, BEN COSTS PSYCH AS 1
[4]  
American Psychological Association, 1993, AM PSYCHOL, V48, P984
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1963, AM PSYCHOL, V18, P56
[6]  
[Anonymous], AM PSYCHOL
[7]  
HAAS LJ, 1995, KEEPING GOOD WORK PR
[8]  
HARRIS E, 1998, PSYCHOL DESK REFEREN, P191
[10]   Impact of managed care on independent practice and professional ethics: A survey of independent practitioners [J].
Murphy, MJ ;
DeBernardo, CR ;
Shoemaker, WE .
PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1998, 29 (01) :43-51