Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation/implantation (MACT/MACI) - 5-year follow-up

被引:368
作者
Behrens, Peter
Bitter, Thomas
Kurz, Bodo
Russlies, Martin
机构
[1] Univ Clin Schleswig Holstein, Dept Orthopaed, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Univ Kiel, Inst Anat, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
关键词
knee; cartilage repair; MACT; MACI; autologous chondrocyte transplantation; matrix;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2006.02.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation/implantation (MACT/MACI) is a new operation procedure using a cell seeded collagen matrix for the treatement of localized full-thickness cartilage defects. A prospective clinical investigation was carried out in order to clarify whether this proves suitable and confirms objective and subjective clinical improvement over a period of up to 5 years after operation. Thirty-eight patients with localised cartilage defects were treated with MACT. Within the context of clinical follow-up, these patients were evaluated for up to 5 years after the intervention. Four different scores (Meyers score, Tegner-Lysholm activity score, Lysholm-Giliquist score, ICRS score) as well as the results of six arthroscopies and biopsies obtained from four patients formed the basis of this study. For 15 patients, 5 or more years had elapsed since the operation at the time this study was completed. It was possible to obtain results 5 years postoperatively from 11 (73.3%) of these 15 patients. Overall, we included 25 patients into the evaluation with a 2-year or longer postoperative period. Five years after transplantation 8 out of 11 patients rated the function of their knee as much better or better than before. Three of the four scores showed significant improvement compared to the preoperative value. One score, the Tegner-Lysholm score showed improvement, which, however, did not prove to be significant. The significantly improved results on three scores after 5 years suggest that MACT represents a suitable but cost-intensive alternative in the treatment of local cartilage defects in the knee. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 202
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
[2]  
Behrens P, 2005, ARTHROSKOPIE, V18, P193, DOI 10.1007/s00142-005-0316-0
[3]   Recommendations for indication and application of ACT of the joined advisory board of the German societies for Traumatology (DGU) and Orthopaedic Surgery (DGOOC) [J].
Behrens, P ;
Bosch, U ;
Bruns, J ;
Erggelet, C ;
Esenwein, SA ;
Gaissmaier, C ;
Krackhardt, T ;
Löhnert, J ;
Marlovits, S ;
Meenen, NM ;
Mollenhauer, J ;
Nehrer, S ;
Niethard, FU ;
Nöth, U ;
Perka, C ;
Richter, W ;
Schäfer, D ;
Schneider, U ;
Steinwachs, M ;
Weise, K .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 2004, 142 (05) :529-539
[4]  
Behrens P, 1999, MMW Fortschr Med, V141, P49
[5]   A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee [J].
Bentley, G ;
Biant, LC ;
Carrington, RWJ ;
Akmal, M ;
Goldberg, A ;
Williams, AM ;
Skinner, JA ;
Pringle, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2003, 85B (02) :223-230
[6]  
Bobic V, 1999, ORTHOPADE, V28, P19
[7]   TREATMENT OF DEEP CARTILAGE DEFECTS IN THE KNEE WITH AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE TRANSPLANTATION [J].
BRITTBERG, M ;
LINDAHL, A ;
NILSSON, A ;
OHLSSON, C ;
ISAKSSON, O ;
PETERSON, L .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (14) :889-895
[8]  
Browne JE, 2005, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P237, DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000164298.63534.64
[9]  
Brucker P, 2002, UNFALLCHIRURG, V105, P443, DOI 10.1007/s00113-001-0372-5
[10]  
BRUNS J, 1997, TW SPORT PLUS MED, V9, P90