Economic values of threatened mammals in Britain: A case study of the otter Lutra lutra and the water vole Arvicola terrestris

被引:92
作者
White, PCL
Gregory, KW
Lindley, PJ
Richards, G
机构
[1] Dept. Environ. Econ. Environ. Mgmt., University of York, Heslington
关键词
economic value; willingness to pay; contingent valuation; otter; water vole;
D O I
10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00036-0
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We investigated the relative economic values of the otter Lutra lutra and the water vole Arvicola terrestris, two species that occupy similar habitats and face common threats of habitat change, habitat fragmentation and pollution. Willingness to pay for conservation was estimated using the contingent valuation method. Data were collected by a telephone survey using a referendum based on willingness to pay a specified amount as a single addition to tax. The most influential variables in determining respondents' willingness to pay were their age, the specified tax amount, whether they were aware of the threats to that specific species, whether they were a member of a conservation organisation and whether they walked frequently in the countryside. Mean willingness to pay values obtained were pound 11.91 for the otter, pound 7.44 for the water vole, and pound 10.92 for both species together. Aggregated over the survey population of North Yorkshire, these results equate to pound 6.4 million, pound 4.0 million and pound 5.8 million, respectively. These figures are well in excess of the calculated present values for the UK action plans for the otter and the water vole (pound 0.8 million and pound 1.0 million, respectively). The results demonstrate strong public support for mammal conservation, in particular for high profile 'flagship' species, and suggest that public profile may be as important as rarity or the degree of threat in determining a species' relative economic value. (C) 1997 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 354
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, SUSTAINABLE ENV EC M
[2]  
[Anonymous], BIODIVERSITY UK STEE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, WATER VOLE ARVICOLA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, NAT CONSERV-CRACOW
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, EC PROTECTED AREAS N
[6]   ELICITATION AND TRUNCATION EFFECTS IN CONTINGENT VALUATION STUDIES [J].
BATEMAN, IJ ;
LANGFORD, IH ;
TURNER, RK ;
WILLIS, KG ;
GARROD, GD .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 12 (02) :161-179
[7]  
BJOERNSTAD DJ, 1996, CONTINGENT VALUATION
[9]  
Carson R. T., 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method
[10]  
Corbet G.B., 1991, Handbook of British mammals, Vthird