Using GRADE in situations of emergencies and urgencies: certainty in evidence and recommendations matters during the COVID-19 pandemic, now more than ever and no matter what

被引:35
作者
Schunemann, Holger J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Santesso, Nancy [1 ,2 ]
Vist, Gunn E. [4 ]
Cuello, Carlos [1 ,2 ]
Lotfi, Tamara [1 ,2 ]
Flottorp, Signe [4 ]
Davoli, Marina [5 ]
Mustafa, Reem [6 ]
Meerpohl, Joerg J. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Alonso-Coello, Pablo [10 ]
Akl, Elie A. [11 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Michael G DeGroote Cochrane Canada, World Hlth Org Collaborating Ctr Infect Dis Res M, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, McMaster GRADE Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Serv, Oslo, Norway
[5] Dept Epidemiol Lazio Reg, Via Cristoforo Colombo 112, Rome, Italy
[6] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[7] Cochrane Germany Fdn, Med Ctr, Inst Evidence Med, Freiburg, Germany
[8] Cochrane Germany Fdn, Fac Med, Freiburg, Germany
[9] Cochrane Germany Fdn, Cochrane Germany, Freiburg, Germany
[10] Biomed Res Inst St Pau IIB St Pau CIBERESP, Iberoamer Cochrane Ctr, Barcelona 08025, Spain
[11] Amer Univ Beirut, Med Ctr, POB 11-0236,CRI E15, Beirut 11072020, Lebanon
关键词
GRADE; Pandemics; Systematic reviews; Recommendations; Guidelines; GUIDELINES; QUALITY; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.030
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Objectives: The public, policy makers, and science communities are subject to many false, uninformed, overly optimistic, premature, or simply ridiculous health claims. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and its context is a paramount example for such claims. In this article, we describe why expressing the certainty in evidence to support a decision is critical and why the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach matters now, perhaps more than ever and no matter what the specific topic is in relation to COVID-19. We finally also offer suggestions for how it can be used appropriately to support decision-making at global, national, and local level when emergency, urgent or rapid responses are needed. Study Design and Setting: This is an invited commentary to address the objectives above building on examples from the recent COVID-19 pandemic. This includes an iterative discussion of examples and development of guidance. Results: The GRADE approach is a transparent and structured method for assessing the certainty of evidence and when developing recommendations that requires little additional time. We describe why emergency, urgent, or rapid responses do not justify omitting this critical assessment of the evidence. In situations of emergencies and urgencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, GRADE can similarly be used to express and convey certainty in intervention effects, test accuracy, risk and prognostic factors, consequences of public health measures, and qualitative bodies of evidence. Conclusions: Assessing and communicating the certainty of evidence during the COVID-19 pandemic is critical. Those offering evidence synthesis or making recommendations should use transparent ratings of the body of evidence supporting a claim regardless of time that is available or needed to provide this response. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 207
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
Alhazzani W, 2020, INTENS CARE MED, V46, P854, DOI [10.1097/CCM.0000000000004363, 10.1007/s00134-020-06022-5]
[2]
GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction [J].
Alonso-Coello, Pablo ;
Schunemann, Holger J. ;
Moberg, Jenny ;
Brignardello-Petersen, Romina ;
Akl, Elie A. ;
Davoli, Marina ;
Treweek, Shaun ;
Mustafa, Reem A. ;
Rada, Gabriel ;
Rosenbaum, Sarah ;
Morelli, Angela ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 353
[3]
Atkins D, 2004, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V328, P1490
[4]
Bhimraj A, 2020, INFECT DIS SOC AM GU
[5]
Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Chu, Derek K. ;
Akl, Elie A. ;
Duda, Stephanie ;
Solo, Karla ;
Yaacoub, Sally ;
Schunemann, Holger J. .
LANCET, 2020, 395 (10242) :1973-1987
[6]
Cochrane, COCHR COVID RAP REV
[7]
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for prostate cancer:: the need for a unified approach [J].
Dahm, Philipp ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Schunemann, Holger .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2007, 17 (03) :200-207
[8]
Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: An analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews [J].
Featherstone R.M. ;
Dryden D.M. ;
Foisy M. ;
Guise J.-M. ;
Mitchell M.D. ;
Paynter R.A. ;
Robinson K.A. ;
Umscheid C.A. ;
Hartling L. .
Systematic Reviews, 4 (1)
[9]
Gautret P, 2020, INT J ANTIMICROB AG, V56, DOI [10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949, 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106063]
[10]
GRADE:: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations [J].
Guyatt, Gordon H. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Alonso-Coello, Pablo ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7650) :924-926