Errors in interpretation of gram stains from positive blood cultures

被引:38
作者
Rand, Kenneth H.
Tillan, Maria
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Pathol Immunol & Lab Med, Div Infect Dis, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
Gram stain; misread Gram stain; Gram positive; Gram negative; Acinetobacter; Bacillus;
D O I
10.1309/V4KE2FPM5T8V4552
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
We reviewed major errors in Gram stain reports from positive blood cultures to identify patterns and potential clinical impact. During a 23-month period, blood cultures were misread for 57 (0.7%) of 8,253 patients. Of 5,885 read as gram-positive cocci, 6 (0.1%) had only gram-negative organisms by culture, 3 of which were Acinetobacter species. Of 1, 959 read as gram-negative bacilli, 25 (1.3%) had only gram-positive organisms by culture. Of these, 9 were Bacillus and 2 were Clostridium species. Nonrecognition of mixed Gram stains accounted for 28 errors that most often were associated with a reading of grain-positive cocci. In 4 cases, there were delays of 14 hours to 3 days in starting appropriate antibiotic treatment; 2 deaths occurred, although the erroneous Gram stain report probably was not contributory. Pathologists and laboratory personnel need to be aware of these types of misinterpretations and the potential effects on patient outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 690
页数:5
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   MECHANISM OF GRAM VARIABILITY IN SELECT BACTERIA [J].
BEVERIDGE, TJ .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 1990, 172 (03) :1609-1620
[2]   Misleading gram stain findings on a smear from a cerebrospinal fluid specimen [J].
Harrington, BJ ;
Plender, M .
LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2004, 35 (08) :475-478
[3]   The Gram stain after more than a century [J].
Popescu, A ;
Doyle, RJ .
BIOTECHNIC & HISTOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 71 (03) :145-151
[4]  
SCHRECKENBERGER PC, 2003, MANUAL CLIN MICROBIO
[5]  
York MK, 2004, CLIN MICROBIOLOGY PR