Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography

被引:332
作者
Barlow, William E.
White, Emily
Ballard-Barbash, Rachel
Vacek, Pamela M.
Titus-Ernstoff, Linda
Carney, Patricia A.
Tice, Jeffrey A.
Buist, Diana S. M.
Geller, Berta M.
Rosenberg, Robert
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Kerlikowske, Karla
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Ctr Hlth Studies, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[3] NCI, Appl Res Program, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Dept Med Biostat, Vermont Reg Canc Ctr, Burlington, VT USA
[5] Norris Cotton Canc Ctr, Lebanon, NH USA
[6] Dartmouth Med Sch, Dept Community & Family Med, Lebanon, NH USA
[7] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Family Med, Portland, OR USA
[8] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[9] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Off Hlth Promot Res, Burlington, VT USA
[10] Univ New Mexico, Dept Radiol, Hlth Sci Ctr, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[11] Univ N Carolina, Dept Radiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[12] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Vet Affairs, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[13] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2006年 / 98卷 / 17期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djj331
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Risk prediction models for breast cancer can be improved by the addition of recently identified risk factors, including breast density and use of hormone therapy. We used prospective risk information to predict a diagnosis of breast cancer in a cohort of 1 million women undergoing screening mammography. Methods: There were 2 392 998 eligible screening mammograms from women without previously diagnosed breast cancer who had had a prior mammogram in the preceding 5 years. Within 1 year of the screening mammogram, 11638 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. Separate logistic regression risk models were constructed for premenopausal and postmenopausal examinations by use of a stringent (P <.0001) criterion for the inclusion of risk factors. Risk models were constructed with 75% of the data and validated with the remaining 25%. Concordance of the predicted with the observed outcomes was assessed by a concordance (c) statistic after logistic regression model fit. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Statistically significant risk factors for breast cancer diagnosis among premenopausal women included age, breast density, family history of breast cancer, and a prior breast procedure. For postmenopausal women, the statistically significant factors included age, breast density, race, ethnicity, family history of breast cancer, a prior breast procedure, body mass index, natural menopause, hormone therapy, and a prior false-positive mammogram. The model may identify high-risk women better than the Gail model, although predictive accuracy was only moderate. The c statistics were 0.631 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.618 to 0.644) for premenopausal women and 0.624 (95% CI = 0.619 to 0.630) for postmenopausal women. Conclusion: Breast density is a strong additional risk factor for breast cancer, although it is unknown whether reduction in breast density would reduce risk. Our risk model may be able to identify women at high risk for breast cancer for preventive interventions or more intensive surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:1204 / 1214
页数:11
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
American College of Radiology, 2003, ILL BREAST IM REP DA
[2]   Evaluation of breast cancer risk assessment packages in the family history evaluation and screening programme [J].
Amir, E ;
Evans, DG ;
Shenton, A ;
Lalloo, F ;
Moran, A ;
Boggis, C ;
Wilson, M ;
Howell, A .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2003, 40 (11) :807-814
[3]   Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Taplin, SH ;
Yankaskas, BC ;
Ernster, VL ;
Rosenberg, RD ;
Carney, PA ;
Barlow, WE ;
Geller, BM ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Edwards, BK ;
Lynch, CF ;
Urban, N ;
Key, CR ;
Poplack, SP ;
Worden, JK ;
Kessler, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :1001-1008
[4]   Secular stability and reliability of measurements of the percentage of dense tissue on mammograms [J].
Benichou, J ;
Byrne, C ;
Capece, LA ;
Carroll, LE ;
Hurt-Mullen, K ;
Pee, DY ;
Salane, M ;
Schairer, C ;
Gail, MH .
CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION, 2003, 27 (04) :266-274
[5]  
Beral Valerie, 2003, Lancet, V362, P419, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14065-2
[6]   Breast imaging reporting and data system: Inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment [J].
Berg, WA ;
Campassi, C ;
Langenberg, P ;
Sexton, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (06) :1769-1777
[7]  
Bernatsky S, 2003, J RHEUMATOL, V30, P1505
[8]   Hormonal exposures and breast cancer in a sample of women with systemic lupus erythematosus [J].
Bernatsky, S ;
Clarke, A ;
Ramsey-Goldman, R ;
Joseph, L ;
Boivin, JF ;
Rajan, R ;
Moore, AD ;
Leung, MH ;
Allen, A ;
Gordon, C .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2004, 43 (09) :1178-1181
[9]  
Bondy Melissa L., 2003, Cancer, V97, P230, DOI 10.1002/cncr.11018
[10]   VALIDATION OF A BREAST-CANCER RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL IN WOMEN WITH A POSITIVE FAMILY HISTORY [J].
BONDY, ML ;
LUSTBADER, ED ;
HALABI, S ;
ROSS, E ;
VOGEL, VG .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1994, 86 (08) :620-625