Evolutionary comparative analyses of the relationship between leaf structure and function

被引:48
作者
Beerling, DJ [1 ]
Kelly, CK [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV N TEXAS,DEPT BIOL SCI,DENTON,TX 76203
关键词
stomatal density; leaf thickness; stomatal conductance; evolutionary comparative method;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01144.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
We have applied evolutionary comparative methods to control for phylogenetic relationships between species in order to determine if three recently proposed relationships between leaf structure and function are upheld, using a large database comprising a wide range of species from tropical and temperate ecosystems. The three hypotheses tested were: (i) leaf thickness is positively correlated with total stomatal density (adaxial and abaxial values summed); (ii) amphistomatous leaves (stomata present on the upper and lower surfaces) have a higher maximum stomatal conductance than hypostomatous (stomata on the lower surface only) leaves, and (iii) changes in the stomatal density on upper and lower leaf surfaces are regulated in a compensatory manner. The results showed that, contrary to several mathematical modelling studies, thicker leaves were not associated with more stomata either in species from lowland tropical rain forests or from central Europe. Amphistomatous leaves had a higher maximum stomatal conductance, indicating that one aspect of previous modelling work is correctly underpinned after accounting for relatedness. Finally, we found no evidence that the stomatal densities on upper and lower leaf surfaces are closely regulated. These three physiological traits are discussed with reference both to the modelling of leaf gas exchange and to plant function in relation to microclimate.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 51
页数:17
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   LEAF CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TROPICAL RAIN-FOREST FLORA OF LOS-TUXTLAS, MEXICO [J].
BONGERS, F ;
POPMA, J .
BOTANICAL GAZETTE, 1990, 151 (03) :354-365
[2]  
CRONQUIST A, 1981, INTEGRATED SYSTEM CL
[3]  
FELSENSTEIN J, 1985, AM NAT, V125, P1, DOI 10.1086/284325
[4]  
Friend AD., 1990, ADV ECOL RES, V20, P59, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60053-7, 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60053-7]
[5]   PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF COMPARATIVE DATA USING PHYLOGENETICALLY INDEPENDENT CONTRASTS [J].
GARLAND, T ;
HARVEY, PH ;
IVES, AR .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 1992, 41 (01) :18-32
[6]  
GITTLEMAN JL, 1992, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V23, P383
[7]  
Harvey P. H., 1991, COMP METHOD EVOLUTIO
[8]   WHY ECOLOGISTS NEED TO BE PHYLOGENETICALLY CHALLENGED [J].
HARVEY, PH ;
READ, AF ;
NEE, S .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1995, 83 (03) :535-536
[9]   PLANT LIFE FORM, STOMATAL DENSITY AND TAXONOMIC RELATEDNESS - A REANALYSIS OF SALISBURY (1927) [J].
KELLY, CK ;
BEERLING, DJ .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1995, 9 (03) :422-431
[10]   SEED SIZE AND ESTABLISHMENT CONDITIONS IN TROPICAL TREES - ON THE USE OF TAXONOMIC RELATEDNESS IN DETERMINING ECOLOGICAL PATTERNS [J].
KELLY, CK ;
PURVIS, A .
OECOLOGIA, 1993, 94 (03) :356-360