Comparison of linear measurements made from storage phosphor and dental radiographs

被引:13
作者
Conover, GL
Hildebolt, CF
YokoyamaCrothers, N
机构
[1] Section of Radiology, School of Dental Medicine, Southern Illinois University, Alton, IL 62002
[2] Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis
关键词
radiography; dental; radiographic image enhancement; biometry; signal processing; computer-assisted;
D O I
10.1259/dmfr.25.5.9161181
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Objectives. To compare linear measurements made from storage phosphor and dental radiographs. Methods. Five dry hemimandibles were imaged with an 8 x 10-inch (20.3/25.4 cm) high-resolution storage phosphor plate and Ektaspeed Plus occlusal-size dental film. Optimal exposure was empirically determined for the dental films. Reductions in exposure of 50 and 75% were used for the storage phosphor. Three observers made linear measurements between end-points of lines and center-points of fiducials on clinical specimens, dental radiographs, digitized dental radiographs and storage phosphor images. Data were analysed with repeated-measures and nested analysis of variance. Results. Measurements obtained from optimally exposed dental films and reduced-exposure storage phosphor images were equivalent to clinical measurements recorded from dry hemimandibles. Less than 2% of variation among measurements was attributable to the five modalities. Conclusion. No substantive difference was detected between linear measurements obtained from the storage phosphor or dental radiographs. Because storage phosphor images require no chemical processing, can be used at reduced exposure and are inherently digital, they are a viable alternative to dental film for making linear measurements. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd for IADMFR.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 273
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
Blume H, 1992, J Digit Imaging, V5, P67
[2]
COMPARISON OF DIGITAL AND CONVENTIONAL MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOGRAPHY - OBSERVER PERFORMANCE STUDY [J].
BRAMBLE, JM ;
MURPHEY, MD .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 177 (02) :587-588
[3]
DIGITAL SKELETAL RADIOGRAPHY [J].
BUCKWALTER, KA ;
BRAUNSTEIN, EM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 158 (05) :1071-1080
[4]
AN EXTENSION OF BOXS RESULTS ON THE USE OF THE F DISTRIBUTION IN MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS [J].
GEISSER, S ;
GREENHOUSE, SW .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1958, 29 (03) :885-891
[5]
GLAZER HS, 1994, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V4, P711
[6]
GREENE RE, 1992, COMPUTED DIGITAL RAD, P2
[7]
COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY UTILIZING LASER-STIMULATED LUMINESCENCE - DETECTABILITY OF SIMULATED LOW-CONTRAST RADIOGRAPHIC OBJECTS [J].
HIGASHIDA, Y ;
MORIBE, N ;
HIRATA, Y ;
MORITA, K ;
DOUDANUKI, S ;
SONODA, Y ;
KATSUDA, N ;
HIAI, Y ;
MISUMI, W ;
MATSUMOTO, M ;
YOSHIOKA, S ;
TAKAHASHI, M .
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 1988, 12 (03) :137-145
[8]
Hillman B J, 1989, J Digit Imaging, V2, P220
[9]
Huynh H., 1976, J EDUC STATIST, V1, P69, DOI [DOI 10.3102/10769986001001069, 10.2307/1164736, DOI 10.2307/1164736]
[10]
ANTHROPOMETRIC OPTICAL-SURFACE IMAGING-SYSTEM REPEATABILITY, PRECISION, AND VALIDATION [J].
KOHN, LAP ;
CHEVERUD, JM ;
BHATIA, G ;
COMMEAN, P ;
SMITH, K ;
VANNIER, MW .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1995, 34 (04) :362-371