Evaluation of cloud thermodynamic phase parametrizations in the LMDZ GCM by using POLDER satellite data

被引:32
作者
Doutriaux-Boucher, M [1 ]
Quaas, J
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Lille, UMR CNRS 8518, Opt Atmospher Lab, F-59655 Villeneuve Dascq, France
[2] Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Meteorol Dynam Lab, IPSL, F-75252 Paris, France
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2003GL019095
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Realistic simulations of clouds are of uppermost importance for climate modelling using general circulation models. Satellite data are well suited to evaluate model parametrizations. In this study we use the Laboratoire de Meteorologie Dynamique general circulation model (LMDZ). We evaluate the current LMDZ cloud phase parametrization, in which the repartition of condensed cloud water between liquid and ice is a function of the local temperature. Three parameters are used to derive a relation between liquid cloud water content and temperature, two of which are not physically based. We use the POLDER-1 satellite data to infer more realistic parameters by establishing statistical relationships between cloud top thermodynamical phase and cloud top temperature, consistently in both satellite data and model results. We then perform a multitude of short model integrations and derive a best estimate for the lowest local temperature where liquid water can exist in a cloud (T-ice=-32degreesC in our parametrization). The other parameter which describes the shape of the transition between ice and liquid water is also estimated. A longer simulation has then been performed with the new parameters, resulting in an improvement in the representation of the shortwave cloud radiative forcing.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Cloud detection and derivation of cloud properties from POLDER [J].
Buriez, JC ;
Vanbauce, C ;
Parol, F ;
Goloub, P ;
Herman, M ;
Bonnel, B ;
Fouquart, Y ;
Couvert, P ;
Seze, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1997, 18 (13) :2785-2813
[2]  
DelGenio AD, 1996, J CLIMATE, V9, P270, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<0270:APCWPF>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   THE POLDER MISSION - INSTRUMENT CHARACTERISTICS AND SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES [J].
DESCHAMPS, PY ;
BREON, FM ;
LEROY, M ;
PODAIRE, A ;
BRICAUD, A ;
BURIEZ, JC ;
SEZE, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1994, 32 (03) :598-615
[5]  
Fowler LD, 1996, J CLIMATE, V9, P489, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<0489:LAICMI>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Analysis of direct comparison of cloud top temperature and infrared split window signature against independant retrievals of cloud thermodynamic phase. [J].
Giraud, V ;
Thouron, O ;
Riedi, J ;
Goloub, P .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2001, 28 (06) :983-986
[8]   Cloud thermodynamical phase classification from the POLDER spaceborne instrument [J].
Goloub, P ;
Herman, M ;
Chepfer, H ;
Riedi, J ;
Brogniez, G ;
Couvert, P ;
Séze, G .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D11) :14747-14759
[9]  
Houze R. A., 1993, Cloud Dynamics
[10]  
Kandel R, 1998, B AM METEOROL SOC, V79, P765, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0765:TSERBD>2.0.CO