How We Design Feasibility Studies

被引:2342
作者
Bowen, Deborah J. [1 ]
Kreuter, Matthew [2 ]
Spring, Bonnie [3 ]
Cofta-Woerpel, Ludmila [5 ,6 ]
Linnan, Laura [7 ]
Weiner, Diane [8 ]
Bakken, Suzanne [10 ]
Kaplan, Cecilia Patrick [11 ]
Squiers, Linda [12 ]
Fabrizio, Cecilia [9 ]
Fernandez, Maria [4 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Dept Social & Behav Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, Hlth Commun Res Lab, Sch Publ Hlth, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Behav Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Univ Texas Houston, Hlth Sci Ctr, Ctr Hlth Promot & Prevent Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Texas Houston, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, NCI, Canc Informat Serv, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Univ Texas Houston, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Behav Sci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[8] Mashantucket Pcquot Tribal Nation, Mashantucket, CT USA
[9] Yale Canc Ctr, NCI, Canc Informat Serv, New Haven, CT USA
[10] Columbia Univ, Sch Nursing, New York, NY USA
[11] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[12] NCI, Canc Informat Serv, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
CANCER; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Public health is moving toward the goal of implementing evidence-based interventions. To accomplish this, there is a need to select, adapt, and evaluate intervention studies. Such selection relies, in part, on making judgments about the feasibility of possible interventions and determining whether comprehensive and multilevel evaluations are justified. There exist few published standards and guides to aid these judgments. This article describes the diverse types of feasibility studies conducted in the field of cancer prevention, using a group of recently funded grants from the National Cancer Institute. The grants were submitted in response to a request for applications proposing research to identify feasible interventions for increasing the utilization of the Cancer Information Service among underserved populations. (Am J Prev Med 2009;36(5):452-457) (c) 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc. oil behalf of American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 457
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Bartholomew L.K., 2006, PLANNING HLTH PROMOT, V2nd
[2]  
Burhansstipanov Linda, 2005, Cancer Control, V12 Suppl 2, P70
[3]   Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues [J].
Glasgow, Russell E. ;
Klesges, Lisa M. ;
Dzewaltowski, David A. ;
Estabrooks, Paul A. ;
Vogt, Thomas M. .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2006, 21 (05) :688-694
[4]  
Green L.W., 1980, HLTH ED PLANNING DIA
[5]   Public health asks of systems science: To advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence? [J].
Green, LW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 96 (03) :406-409
[6]   Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research - Issues in external validation and translation methodology [J].
Green, LW ;
Glasgow, RE .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2006, 29 (01) :126-153
[7]  
Green LW., 1994, Study of participatory research in health promotion
[8]   THE SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO CANCER CONTROL [J].
GREENWALD, P ;
CULLEN, JW .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1984, 34 (06) :328-332
[9]   Reducing the digital divide for low-income women with breast cancer: A feasibility study of a population-based intervention [J].
Gustafson, DH ;
McTavish, FM ;
Stengle, W ;
Ballard, D ;
Jones, E ;
Julesberg, K ;
McDowell, H ;
Landucci, G ;
Hawkins, R .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2005, 10 :173-193
[10]  
Minkler M., 2003, COMMUNITY BASED PART