The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?

被引:2030
作者
Brewer, MB [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/0022-4537.00126
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Allport (1954) recognized that attachment to one's ingroups does not necessarily require hostility toward outgroups. Yet the prevailing approach to the study of ethnocentrism, ingroup bias, and prejudice presumes that ingroup love and outgroup hate are reciprocally related. Findings from both cross-cultural research and laboratory experiments support the alternative view that ingroup identification is independent of negative attitudes toward outgoups and that much ingroup bias and intergroup discrimination is motivated by preferential treatment of ingroup members rather than direct hostility toward outgroup members. Thus to understand the roots of prejudice and discrimination requires first of all a better understanding of the functions that ingroup formation and identification serve for human beings. This article reviews research anal theory on the motivations for maintenance of ingroup boundaries and the implications of ingroup boundary protection for intergroup relations, conflict, and conflict prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 444
页数:16
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Allport G.W., 1954, NATURE PREJUDICE
[2]  
Almond G., 1963, CIVIC CULT
[3]  
[Anonymous], FRONTIERS SOCIAL DIL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV CUR
[7]  
Brewer M.B., 1972, HRAFlex ethnocentrism interview series
[8]  
Brewer M.B., 1976, Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes: East African evidence
[9]  
Brewer M.B., 1981, Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences
[10]  
Brewer M. B., 1986, PSYCHOL INTERGROUP R, P82