Subcutaneous lidocaine delivered by jet-injector for pain control before IV catheterization in the ED: The patients' perception and preference

被引:10
作者
Peter, DJ [1 ]
Scott, JP [1 ]
Watkins, HC [1 ]
Frasure, HE [1 ]
机构
[1] Akron Gen Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Akron, OH 44307 USA
关键词
pain control; lidocaine; intravenous cannualtion; jet-injection; anesthesia; emergency department;
D O I
10.1053/ajem.2002.35493
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
To evaluate patients' perceptions and preferences concerning pain control during intravenous (IV) catheterization, a sample of 50 adult patients received subcutaneous lidocaine (0.2 mL 1%) by jet injector, or no anesthetic with a sham injection before IV catheterization. Visual analog scale (VAS), pain intensity score (PIS), and adverse reactions were recorded. A significant difference existed in the scores of patients who received lidocaine versus those who did not VAS (P <.001) PIS (P <.004). Patients' receiving lidocaine via jet-injector experienced more minor and potentially preventable adverse effects such as mild bruising and trauma to the veins. Patients in both groups (84% overall) preferred local anesthesia based on this experience. Using the jet-injector to provide local anesthesia before IV catheterization in the ED is effective, fast, and does not require sharps disposal and handling precautions. (Am J Emerg Med 2002;20:562-566. Copyright (C) 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 566
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   ETHYL CHLORIDE AND VENIPUNCTURE PAIN - A COMPARISON WITH INTRADERMAL LIDOCAINE [J].
ARMSTRONG, P ;
YOUNG, C ;
MCKEOWN, D .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1990, 37 (06) :656-658
[2]   Iontophoretic administration of 2% lidocaine HCl and 1:100,000 epinephrine in humans [J].
Ashburn, MA ;
Gauthier, M ;
Love, G ;
Basta, S ;
Gaylord, B ;
Kessler, K .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1997, 13 (01) :22-26
[3]   Subcutaneous administration of midazolam: A comparison of the Bioject jet injector with the conventional syringe and needle [J].
Bennett, J ;
Nichols, F ;
Rosenblum, M ;
Condry, J .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 56 (11) :1249-1254
[4]   Evaluation of a needle-free injection system for local anaesthesia prior to venous cannulation [J].
Cooper, JA ;
Bromley, LM ;
Baranowski, AP ;
Barker, SGE .
ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 55 (03) :247-250
[5]   TOPICAL ANESTHESIA WITH EMLA, A NEW LIDOCAINE-PRILOCAINE CREAM AND THE CUSUM TECHNIQUE FOR DETECTION OF MINIMAL APPLICATION TIME [J].
EHRENSTROMREIZ, G ;
REIZ, S ;
STOCKMAN, O .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1983, 27 (06) :510-512
[6]   THE EFFICACY AND ACCEPTABILITY OF USING A JET INJECTOR IN PERFORMING DIGITAL BLOCKS [J].
ELLIS, GL ;
OWENS, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1993, 11 (06) :648-650
[7]  
Florentine BD, 1997, DIAGN CYTOPATHOL, V17, P472, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199712)17:6<472::AID-DC18>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-J
[9]   COMPARISON OF IONTOPHORESIS OF LIDOCAINE WITH A EUTECTIC MIXTURE OF LIDOCAINE AND PRILOCAINE (EMLA) FOR TOPICALLY ADMINISTERED LOCAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
GREENBAUM, SS ;
BERNSTEIN, EF .
JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY AND ONCOLOGY, 1994, 20 (09) :579-583
[10]   APPROPRIATE USE OF LOCAL-ANESTHETIC FOR VENOUS CANNULATION [J].
HARRISON, N ;
LANGHAM, BT ;
BOGOD, DG .
ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 47 (03) :210-212