Histomorphometric, ultrastructural and microhardness evaluation of the osseointegration of a nanostructured titanium oxide coating by metal-organic chemical vapour deposition: an in vivo study

被引:71
作者
Giavaresi, G
Ambrosio, L
Battiston, GA
Casellato, U
Gerbasi, R
Finia, M
Aldini, NN
Martini, L
Rimondini, L
Giardino, R
机构
[1] Ist Ric Codivilla Putti, Ist Ortoped, Serv Chirurg Sperimentale, Dept Expt Surg, I-40132 Bologna, BO, Italy
[2] CNR, Inst Composite & Biomed Mat, Naples, Italy
[3] CNR, Inst Inorgan Chem & Surfaces, Padua, Italy
[4] Univ Bologna, Fac Med, Bologna, Italy
关键词
titanium oxide; metal surface treatment; osseointegration; histomorphometry; scanning electron microscopy (SEM); mechanical properties;
D O I
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.017
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 [生物医学工程];
摘要
Over the past decade the increase of elderly population has determined a rise in the incidence of bone fractures, and the improvement of the implant-bone interface remains an open problem. Metal-organic chemical vapour deposition (MOCVD) has recently been proposed as a technique to coat orthopaedic and dental prostheses with metal nanostructured oxide films either through the decomposition of oxygenated compounds (single-source precursors) or the reaction of oxygen-free metal compounds with oxygenating agents. The present study was performed to assess the in vivo biocompatibility of commercially pure Ti (control material: TI/MA) implants (circle divide 2 mm x 5 mm length) coated with nanostructured TiO2 films by MOCVD (Ti/MOCVD) and then inserted into rabbit femoral cortical (middhiaphysis) and cancellous (distal epiphysis) bone. Histomorphometric, ultrastructural and microhardness investigations were carried out. Four and 12 weeks after surgery, significant (p<0.0005) increases in Al of Ti/MOCVD implants were observed as compared to Ti/MA implants (distal femoral epiphysis: 4 weeks = 8.2%, ns; 12 weeks = 52.3%, p<0.005: femoral diaphysis: 4 weeks=20.2%, p<0.0005; 12 weeks=10.7%, p<0.005). Bone microhardness results showed significant increases for the Ti/MOCVD versus Ti/MA implants at 200 mum in the femoral diaphysis (4 weeks=14.2, p<0.005) and distal femoral epiphysis (12 weeks = 14.5, p<0.01) at 4 and 12 weeks, respectively. In conclusion, the current findings demonstrate that the nanostructured TiO2 coating positively affects the osseointegration rate of commercially pure Ti implants and the bone mineralization at the bone-biomaterial interface in both cortical and cancellous bone. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5583 / 5591
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production [J].
Andersson, AS ;
Bäckhed, F ;
von Euler, A ;
Richter-Dahlfors, A ;
Sutherland, D ;
Kasemo, B .
BIOMATERIALS, 2003, 24 (20) :3427-3436
[2]
[Anonymous], 1998, HDB BIOMATERIAL PROP
[3]
Al2O3 thin films from aluminium dimethylisopropoxide by metal-organic chemical vapour deposition [J].
Barreca, D ;
Battiston, GA ;
Gerbasi, R ;
Tondello, E .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY, 2000, 10 (09) :2127-2130
[4]
BATTISTON G, Patent No. 000051
[5]
INFLUENCE OF SUBSTRATE ON STRUCTURAL-PROPERTIES OF TIO2 THIN-FILMS OBTAINED VIA MOCVD [J].
BATTISTON, GA ;
GERBASI, R ;
PORCHIA, M ;
MARIGO, A .
THIN SOLID FILMS, 1994, 239 (02) :186-191
[6]
Factors in implant integration failure after bone grafting - An osteometric and endocrinologic matched analysis [J].
Blomqvist, JE ;
Alberius, P ;
Isaksson, S ;
Linde, A ;
Hansson, BG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 25 (01) :63-68
[7]
INFLUENCE OF SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS ON BONE INTEGRATION OF TITANIUM IMPLANTS - A HISTOMORPHOMETRIC STUDY IN MINIATURE PIGS [J].
BUSER, D ;
SCHENK, RK ;
STEINEMANN, S ;
FIORELLINI, JP ;
FOX, CH ;
STICH, H .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1991, 25 (07) :889-902
[8]
Surface studies of in vitro biocompatibility of titanium oxide coatings [J].
Casaletto, MP ;
Ingo, GM ;
Kaciulis, S ;
Mattogno, G ;
Pandolfi, L ;
Scavia, G .
APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE, 2001, 172 (1-2) :167-177
[9]
Codato S, 1999, CHEM VAPOR DEPOS, V5, P159, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3862(199908)5:4<159::AID-CVDE159>3.0.CO
[10]
2-E