Many to flower, few to fruit:: The reproductive biology of Hamamelis virginiana (Hamamelidaceae)

被引:27
作者
Anderson, GJ [1 ]
Hill, JD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Ecol & Evolut Biol, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
breeding system; floral phenology; fruit/flower ratios; Hamamelidaceae; Hamamelis; pollen/ovule ratios; pollination; pollinator limitation; reproductive limitations;
D O I
10.3732/ajb.89.1.67
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Hamamelis virginiana flowers from late September to late November. In 1977, we began studying the reproductive biology of this eastern North American arborescent shrub by examining floral phenology and rewards, pollen-ovule ratios, breeding system, pollination, pollinator and resource limitation, and seed dispersal. The homogamous, self-incompatible flowers emit a faint odor, bear nectar with sucrose ratios typical of bee- and fly-pollinated flowers, and produce abundant sticky pollen Flowers were visited infrequently by insects representing six orders Flies were the most common floral visitors, specifically members of the genus Bradysia, but small bees also carried high percentages of Hamamelis pollen. Despite high pollen/ovule ratios (11445 grams/ovule), bees and flies are likely pollinators, as experiments indicate wind pollination is less likely. Pollen quantity and resource availability did not appear to limit reproductive output, but pollen quality did. Tests of >40000 flowers showed natural fruit set to be <1 %. The flowering time, breeding system, and clumped distribution of plants, likely due in part to limited seed dispersal, combine to yield this remarkably low fruit set. Because all other species of Hamamelis flower from late winter to early summer. it may be that H. virginiana evolved a fall flowering phenology to avoid competition for pollinators with the closely related H vernalis.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 78
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   POLLINATION BIOLOGY OF TILIA [J].
ANDERSON, GJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1976, 63 (09) :1203-1212
[2]  
Baker H.G., 1983, P126
[3]  
Baker H.G., 1983, P117
[4]  
Berry E. W., 1923, TREE ANCESTORS GLIMP
[5]  
BERTIN RI, 1990, AM J BOT, V77, P178, DOI [10.2307/2444640, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1990.tb13544.x]
[6]  
BRADBURY JW, 1977, BIOL BATS, V3, P1
[7]   PHENOLOGY OF CANOPY TREES OF A TROPICAL DECIDUOUS FOREST IN MEXICO [J].
BULLOCK, SH ;
SOLISMAGALLANES, JA .
BIOTROPICA, 1990, 22 (01) :22-35
[8]  
CRUDEN RW, 1977, EVOLUTION, V31, P32, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1977.tb00979.x
[9]  
DESTEVEN D, 1982, J ECOL, V70, P437
[10]  
DESTEVEN D, 1983, MICH BOT, V22, P163