Subcutaneous chest ports via the internal jugular vein - A retrospective study of 117 oncology patients

被引:64
作者
Yip, D [1 ]
Funaki, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago Hosp, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
central venous access; neoplasm; catheters; catheterization; complications;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0455.2002.430405.x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To review image-guided chest port insertion using the right internal jugular vein as the access site of choice. Material and Methods: One hundred and eighteen subcutaneous chest ports were placed via the internal jugular vein in 117 patients with malignancies using both fluoroscopic and US guidance in interventional radiology suites. Results: The technical success rate was 100% with no procedural complications. Follow-up was obtained in all patients with total access days of 40,450 days (mean, 342.8 days). Premature catheter removal was required in 8 patients (6.8%, 0.20 per 1,000 access days) due to non-treatable complications: 2 catheter occlusions/malfunctions (1.7%, 0.05 per 1,000 access days), 1 catheter-related skin erosion (0.85%, 0.024 per 1,000 access days), and 5 infections (4.2%, 0.15 per 1,000 access days). Two symptomatic right upper extremity venous thromboses also occurred (1.7%, 0.05 per 1,000 access days) that were treated successfully with anticoagulation. Conclusion: Image-guided placement of internal jugular vein chest ports has a high success rate and low complication rate compared with reported series of unguided subclavian vein port insertion. The internal jugular vein should be used as the preferred venous access site compared to the subclavian vein.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 375
页数:5
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Routine fluoroscopic guidance is not required for placement of Hickman catheters via the supraclavicular route [J].
Apsner, R ;
Schulenburg, A ;
Sunder-Plassmann, G ;
Muhm, M ;
Keil, F ;
Malzer, R ;
Kalhs, P ;
Druml, W .
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 21 (11) :1149-1152
[2]  
BARRIOS CH, 1992, ONCOLOGY, V49, P474
[3]  
Benter T, 2001, ULTRASCHALL MED, V22, P23
[4]   Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy - A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days [J].
Biffi, R ;
de Braud, E ;
Orsi, E ;
Pozzi, S ;
Mauri, S ;
Goldhirsch, A ;
Nole, F ;
Andreoni, B .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1998, 9 (07) :767-773
[5]   Peripheral venous access ports: Outcomes analysis in 109 patients [J].
Bodner, LJ ;
Nosher, JL ;
Patel, KM ;
Siegel, RL ;
Biswal, R ;
Gribbin, CE ;
Tokarz, R .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 23 (03) :187-193
[6]   IMPLANTATION OF PAS PORT VENOUS ACCESS DEVICE IN THE FOREARM UNDER FLUOROSCOPIC GUIDANCE [J].
BRANTZAWADZKI, M ;
ANTHONY, M ;
MERCER, EC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 160 (05) :1127-1128
[7]  
BROTHERS TE, 1988, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V166, P295
[8]  
BROVIAC JW, 1973, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V136, P602
[9]   Are routine chest radiographs necessary after image-guided placement of internal jugular central venous access devices? [J].
Chang, TC ;
Funaki, B ;
Szymski, GX .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 170 (02) :335-337
[10]   Subcutaneous ports in the radiology suite: An effective and safe procedure for care in cancer patients [J].
deGregorio, MA ;
Miguelena, JM ;
Fernandez, JA ;
deGregorio, C ;
Tres, A ;
Alfonso, ER .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1996, 6 (05) :748-752