Changing trends in peripartum hysterectomy over the last 4 decades

被引:152
作者
Flood, Karen M. [1 ]
Said, Soha [1 ]
Geary, Michael
Robson, Michael [2 ]
Fitzpatrick, Christopher [3 ]
Malone, Fergal D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rotunda Hosp, Royal Coll Surg Ireland, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Dublin 1, Ireland
[2] Natl Matern Hosp, Dublin 2, Ireland
[3] Coombe Women & Infants Univ Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
cesarean section delivery; peripartum hysterectomy; placenta accreta; trend; CESAREAN HYSTERECTOMY; POSTPARTUM HYSTERECTOMY; HEMORRHAGE; EXPERIENCE; SECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.001
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify changing trends in peripartum hysterectomy (PH) in a single large obstetric population over the last 40 years. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed from 1966-2005 of patients who had PH in any of the 3 Dublin obstetric hospitals. Cases were identified, and details were obtained from the combined patient databases of each hospital. RESULTS: There were 872,379 deliveries during the study period, among which 358 women underwent PH (0.4/1000 deliveries). In a comparison of the study decades 1966-1975 with 1996-2005, PH decreased from 0.9 per 1000 deliveries to 0.2 of 1000 deliveries. Although the overall cesarean delivery rate has increased from 6-19% during these 2 decades, the percentage of PH that occurs in the setting of a previous cesarean delivery has increased from 27-57% (P<.00001). Indications for PH have changed significantly in this time period, with "uterine rupture" as the indication for PH decreasing from 40.5-9.3% (P<.0001) and placenta accreta as the indication increasing significantly from 5.4-46.5% (P<.00001). CONCLUSION: PH has decreased over the last 4 decades. However, alongside the rising cesarean delivery rate, there has been a marked increase in the incidence of placenta accreta.
引用
收藏
页码:632.e1 / 632.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, NATL VITAL STAT REP
[2]  
BARCLAY DL, 1970, OBSTET GYNECOL, V35, P120
[3]  
CHESTNUT DH, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V65, P365
[4]  
Eniola O A, 2006, J Obstet Gynaecol, V26, P104, DOI 10.1080/01443610500443196
[5]   Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: A comparison of cesarean and postpartum hysterectomy [J].
Forna, F ;
Miles, AM ;
Jamieson, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (05) :1440-1444
[6]   Peripartum hysterectomy - 1999 to 2006 [J].
Glaze, Sarah ;
Ekwalanga, Pauline ;
RobertS, Gregory ;
Lange, Ian ;
Birch, Colin ;
Rosengarten, Albert ;
Jarrell, John ;
Ross, Sue .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (03) :732-738
[7]   Peripartum hysterectomy in Taiwan [J].
Jou, Hei-Jen ;
Hung, Hsin-Wen ;
Ling, Pei-Ying ;
Chen, Shih-Ming ;
Wu, Shiao-Chi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2008, 101 (03) :269-272
[8]   Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: Experience at a community teaching hospital [J].
Kastner, ES ;
Figueroa, R ;
Garry, D ;
Maulik, D .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (06) :971-975
[9]   Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary Istanbul hospital [J].
Kayabasoglu, Furkan ;
Guzin, Kadir ;
Aydogdu, Serkan ;
Sezginsoy, Selen ;
Turkgeldi, Lale ;
Gunduz, Gunes .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2008, 278 (03) :251-256