Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: Preliminary results

被引:417
作者
Kuhl, CK
Schmutzler, RK
Leutner, CC
Kempe, A
Wardelmann, E
Hocke, A
Maringa, M
Pfeifer, U
Krebs, D
Schild, HH
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Bonn, Med Ctr, Dept Gynecol & Gynecol Oncol, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
[3] Univ Bonn, Med Ctr, Dept Human Genet, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
关键词
breast; MR; breast neoplasms; diagnosis; radiography; US; cancer screening; genes and genetics;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap01267
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with conventional imaging in screening high-risk women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective trial included 192 asymptomatic and six symptomatic women who, on the basis of personal or family history or genetic analysis, were suspected or proved to carry a breast cancer susceptibility gene. RESULTS: Fifteen breast cancers were identified: nine in the 192 asymptomatic;women (six in the first and three in the second screening round) and six in the :symptomatic patients. Concerning the asymptomatic women, four of the nine breast cancers were detected and correctly classified with mammography and ultrasonography (US) combined; another two cancers were visible as well-circumscribed masses and were diagnosed as fibroadenomas. MR imaging allowed the correct classification and local staging of all nine cancers. In 105 asymptomatic women with validation of the 1st-year screening results, the sensitivities of mammography, US, and MR imaging were 33%, 33% (mammography and US combined, 44%), and 100%, respectively; the positive predictive values were 30%, 12%, and 64%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of MR imaging is significantly higher than that of conventional imaging in screening high-risk women. Difficulties can be caused by an atypical manifestation of hereditary breast cancers at both conventional and MR imaging and by contrast material enhancement associated with hormonal stimulation.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 279
页数:13
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
*AM COLL RAD, 1995, BREAST IM REP DAT SY, P15
[2]  
Armes JE, 1998, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V83, P2335, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981201)83:11<2335::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-N
[4]   ''AT risk'' for breast cancer [J].
Bebb, G ;
Glickman, B ;
Gelmon, K ;
Gatti, R .
LANCET, 1997, 349 (9068) :1784-1785
[5]   Radiation risk of mammography related to benefit in screening programmes: a favourable balance? [J].
Beemsterboer, PMM ;
Warmerdam, PG ;
Boer, R ;
de Koning, HJ .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 1998, 5 (02) :81-87
[6]  
Chang-Claude J, 1995, Zentralbl Gynakol, V117, P423
[7]  
Claus EB, 1996, CANCER, V77, P2318, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2318::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-Z
[9]  
DECKER D, 1993, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V269, P2608
[10]  
DEKONING HJ, 1995, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V87, P1217