Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound to Diagnose Nodal Invasion by Rectal Cancers: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

被引:112
作者
Puli, Srinivas R. [1 ]
Reddy, Jyotsna B. K. [1 ]
Bechtold, Matthew L. [1 ]
Choudhary, Abhishek [1 ]
Antillon, Mainor R. [1 ]
Brugge, William R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, GI Unit, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; ENDORECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE IRRADIATION; ENDOLUMINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; PELVIC EXENTERATION; CONTINUOUS-INFUSION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-009-0337-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Nodal staging in patients with rectal cancer predicts prognosis and directs therapy. Published data on the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for diagnosing nodal invasion in patients with rectal cancer has been inconsistent. To evaluate the accuracy of EUS in diagnosing nodal metastasis of rectal cancers. Study Selection Criteria: Only EUS studies confirmed by surgical histology were selected. Data Collection and Extraction: Articles were searched in Medline, Pubmed, and CENTRAL. Statistical Method: Pooling was conducted by both fixed-effects model and random-effects model. The initial search identified 3610 reference articles in which 352 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Data were extracted from 35 studies (N = 2732) that met the inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity of EUS in diagnosing nodal involvement by rectal cancers was 73.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 70.6-75.6). EUS had a pooled specificity of 75.8% (95% CI 73.5-78.0). The positive likelihood ratio of EUS was 2.84 (95% CI 2.16-3.72), and negative likelihood ratio was 0.42 (95% CI 0.33-0.52). All the pooled estimates, calculated by fixed- and random-effect models, were similar. SROC curves showed an area under the curve of 0.79. The P for chi-squared heterogeneity for all the pooled accuracy estimates was >.10. EUS is an important and accurate diagnostic tool for evaluating nodal metastasis of rectal cancers. This meta-analysis shows that the sensitivity and specificity of EUS is moderate. Further refinement in EUS technologies and diagnostic criteria are needed to improve the diagnostic accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:1255 / 1265
页数:11
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Use of preoperative ultrasound staging for treatment of rectal cancer [J].
Adams, DR ;
Blatchford, GJ ;
Lin, KM ;
Ternent, CA ;
Thorson, AG ;
Christensen, MA .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1999, 42 (02) :159-166
[2]  
Agresti A., 1984, ANAL ORDINAL CATEGOR, V1st
[3]   Endorectal ultrasonography and treatment of early stage rectal cancer [J].
Akasu, T ;
Kondo, H ;
Moriya, Y ;
Sugihara, K ;
Gotoda, T ;
Fujita, S ;
Muto, T ;
Kakizoe, T .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 24 (09) :1061-1068
[4]   Limitations and pitfalls of transrectal ultrasonography for staging of rectal cancer [J].
Akasu, T ;
Sugihara, K ;
Moriya, Y ;
Fujita, S .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (10) :S10-S15
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SYSTEMATIC REV HLTH
[6]  
[Anonymous], Annual report to the nation 2021: special topic: patient economic burden of cancer care
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Analysis of binary data
[8]  
*APZBAR, 2006, W INDIAN MED J, V55, P313
[9]   LONG-TERM RISK OF COLORECTAL-CANCER AFTER EXCISION OF RECTOSIGMOID ADENOMAS [J].
ATKIN, WS ;
MORSON, BC ;
CUZICK, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (10) :658-662
[10]   Assessment of local stage in rectal cancer using endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) [J].
Bali C. ;
Nousias V. ;
Fatouros M. ;
Stefanou D. ;
Kappas A.M. .
Techniques in Coloproctology, 2004, 8 (Suppl 1) :S170-S173