Colour Doppler ultrasound predicts chemotherapy response, but not survival in paediatric osteosarcoma

被引:9
作者
Bramer, JAM
Gubler, FM
Maas, M
Bras, H
de Kraker, J
van der Eijken, JW
Schaap, GR
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Spaarne Zienkenhuis, Dept Radiol, Heemstede, Netherlands
[3] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Paediat Oncol, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
skeleton; long bone; primary neoplasm; osteosarcoma; treatment effect; colour Doppler ultrasound; child;
D O I
10.1007/s00247-004-1210-z
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Histological response to chemotherapy is an important prognostic factor in osteosarcoma, influencing therapeutic considerations. It would be advantageous to be able to assess chemotherapy response, and predict survival, prior to tumour resection. Colour Doppler US (CDUS) is non-invasive, non-demanding for the patient, and easy to plan. This makes the method especially suitable for children, who comprise the majority of patients. Objective: To establish the value of CDUS for pre-operative prediction of chemotherapy response and survival, using widely available US equipment. Materials and methods: CDUS was performed in 21 consecutive patients before and after chemotherapy. Peak systolic velocity (PSV) in the soft-tissue component of the tumour and quotient of resistive index (QRI) of the feeding artery and contralateral control were calculated. A pathologist, unaware of CDUS results, assessed the response to chemotherapy after resection. Results: QRI change after chemotherapy was significantly higher in histological responders. No correlation of QRI change with survival was found. There was no significant difference in PSV change comparing any subgroup. CDUS appeared useful in predicting chemotherapy response (sensitivity 83%, specificity 86%), especially for negative response (predictive value 92%). Survival could not be predicted accurately. Conclusions: CDUS can predict chemotherapy response, but not survival. The method could be useful in planning treatment prior to definitive surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:614 / 619
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   FACTOR-ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN PREDICTING THE RESPONSE OF OSTEOSARCOMA TO CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
BONNEROT, V ;
CHARPENTIER, A ;
FROUIN, F ;
KALIFA, C ;
VANEL, D ;
DIPAOLA, R .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1992, 27 (10) :847-855
[2]   OSTEO-SARCOMA - ANGIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF RESPONSE TO PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
CARRASCO, CH ;
CHARNSANGAVEJ, C ;
RAYMOND, AK ;
RICHLI, WR ;
WALLACE, S ;
CHAWLA, SP ;
AYALA, AG ;
MURRAY, JA ;
BENJAMIN, RS .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (03) :839-842
[3]   PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN OSTEOSARCOMA - A CRITICAL-REVIEW [J].
DAVIS, AM ;
BELL, RS ;
GOODWIN, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (02) :423-431
[4]   Osteogenic and Ewing sarcomas: Estimation of necrotic fraction during induction chemotherapy with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging [J].
Dyke, JP ;
Panicek, DM ;
Healey, JH ;
Meyers, PA ;
Huvos, AG ;
Schwartz, LH ;
Thaler, HT ;
Tofts, PS ;
Gorlick, R ;
Koutcher, JA ;
Ballon, D .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (01) :271-278
[5]  
ENNEKING WF, 1986, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P9
[6]   RESPONSE OF OSTEOSARCOMA AND EWING SARCOMA TO PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY - ASSESSMENT WITH DYNAMIC AND STATIC MR IMAGING AND SKELETAL SCINTIGRAPHY [J].
ERLEMANN, R ;
SCIUK, J ;
BOSSE, A ;
RITTER, J ;
KUSNIERZGLAZ, CR ;
PETERS, PE ;
WUISMAN, P .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 175 (03) :791-796
[7]   ROTATION-PLASTY [J].
FIXSEN, JA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1983, 65 (05) :529-530
[8]   RESPONSE OF OSTEOSARCOMA AND EWING SARCOMA TO CHEMOTHERAPY - IMAGING EVALUATION [J].
FLETCHER, BD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1991, 157 (04) :825-833
[9]   PEDIATRIC MUSCULOSKELETAL TUMORS - USE OF DYNAMIC, CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR IMAGING TO MONITOR RESPONSE TO CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
FLETCHER, BD ;
HANNA, SL ;
FAIRCLOUGH, DL ;
GRONEMEYER, SA .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (01) :243-248
[10]  
Franzius C, 2002, J NUCL MED, V43, P1012