Differential influences of exercise intensity on information processing in the central nervous system

被引:204
作者
Kamijo, K
Nishihira, Y
Hatta, A
Kaneda, T
Wasaka, T
Kida, T
Kuroiwa, K
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Grad Sch Comprehens Human Sci, Doctoral Program, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
[2] Univ Tsukuba, Inst Hlth & Sports Sci, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
[3] Univ Tsukuba, Doctoral Program Hlth & Sports Sci, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
关键词
event-related potential; P300; No-go P300; inverted U-shaped behavior;
D O I
10.1007/s00421-004-1097-2
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
The influence of exercise intensity on information processing in the central nervous system was investigated using P300 and no-go P300 event-related potentials. Twelve subjects (22-33 years) performed a go/no-go reaction time task in a control condition, and again after high-, medium-, and low-intensity pedaling exercises. Compared to the control condition, P300 amplitude decreased after high-intensity pedaling exercise and increased after medium-intensity pedaling exercise. There was no change after low-intensity pedaling exercise. These results suggested that the amount of attentional resources devoted to a given task decreased after high-intensity exercise and increased after medium-intensity exercise. The findings also suggest that changes in P300 amplitude are an inverted U-shaped behavior of differences in exercise intensity. In addition, no-go P300 amplitude showed the same changes as P300 amplitude at different exercise intensities. This indicates that differences in exercise intensity influenced not only the intensity of processing the requirement for a go response, but also processing of the need for a no-go response. It is concluded that differences in exercise intensity influenced information processing in the CNS.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 311
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task [J].
Bokura, H ;
Yamaguchi, S ;
Kobayashi, S .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (12) :2224-2232
[2]  
BORG G, 1970, Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, V2, P92
[3]   Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? [J].
Bruin, KJ ;
Wijers, AA ;
van Staveren, ASJ .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (09) :1660-1671
[4]   IS THE P300 COMPONENT A MANIFESTATION OF CONTEXT UPDATING [J].
DONCHIN, E ;
COLES, MGH .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1988, 11 (03) :357-374
[5]   The effect of response execution on P3 latency, reaction time, and movement time [J].
Doucet, C ;
Stelmack, RM .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 36 (03) :351-363
[6]   ERP components in Go Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition [J].
Falkenstein, M ;
Hoormann, J ;
Hohnsbein, J .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1999, 101 (2-3) :267-291
[7]   The NoGo-anteriorization as a neurophysiological standard-index for cognitive response control [J].
Fallgatter, AJ ;
Strik, WK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 32 (03) :233-238
[8]   Effect of physical exhaustion on cognitive functioning [J].
Fery, YA ;
Ferry, A ;
VomHofe, A ;
Rieu, M .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1997, 84 (01) :291-298
[9]   Objective evaluation of fatigue by event-related potentials [J].
Kaseda, Y ;
Jiang, CH ;
Kurokawa, K ;
Mimori, Y ;
Nakamura, S .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1998, 158 (01) :96-100
[10]   On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity [J].
Kok, A .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 38 (03) :557-577