A fuzzy preference-ranking model for a quality evaluation of hospital Web sites

被引:137
作者
Bilsel, R. Ufuk
Buyukozkan, Gulcin [1 ]
Ruan, Da
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Harold & Inge Marcus Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Galatasaray Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34357 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] CEN SCK, Belgian Nucl Res Ctr, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1002/int.20177
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This article presents a quality evaluation model for measuring the performance of hospital Web sites. The model is developed on the basis of a conceptual framework, which consists of seven major e-service quality dimensions, including tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, confidence, empathy, quality of information, and integration of communication issues of Web sites. The dimensions and their associated attributes are first obtained from published articles in the health care and information technology literature and then adapted according to the suggestions of related domain experts. Two multicriteria decision-making methods are used in the evaluation procedure. Determined Web site evaluation dimensions and their relevant attributes are weighted using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Vagueness in some stages of the evaluation required the incorporation of fuzzy numbers in the assessment process. Both fuzzy and crisp data are then synthesized using the fuzzy PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation) ranking method. The model is applied initially to measure the performance of the Web sites of Turkish hospitals. This study should be of interest to health care and technology practitioners and researchers, as the findings shed light on the further development of performance measurements for hospital Web sites. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1197
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality [J].
Aladwani, AM ;
Palvia, PC .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2002, 39 (06) :467-476
[2]   Formulating national information technology strategies: A preference ranking model using PROMETHEE method [J].
Albadvi, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 153 (02) :290-296
[3]   Model choice in multicriteria decision aid [J].
AlShemmeri, T ;
AlKloub, B ;
Pearman, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 97 (03) :550-560
[4]  
ANDREOLINI M, 2005, WEB ENG THEORY PRACT
[5]  
[Anonymous], INT J QUALITY RELIAB, DOI DOI 10.1108/02656710210434784
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, INT INF LIBR REV, DOI DOI 10.1006/iilr.2002.0205
[7]   Ranking of enterprises based on multicriterial analysis [J].
Babic, Z ;
Plazibat, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1998, 56-7 :29-35
[8]   Measuring Web site quality improvements: a case study of the forum on strategic management knowledge exchange [J].
Barnes, SJ ;
Vidgen, R .
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2003, 103 (5-6) :297-309
[9]   A systematic critique of diabetes on the world wide web for patients and their physicians [J].
Bedell, SE ;
Agrawal, A ;
Petersen, LE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2004, 73 (9-10) :687-694
[10]  
Bouri A., 2002, J MULTI-CRITERIA DEC, V11, P269