Development and Validation of the Scientific Reasoning Scale

被引:90
作者
Drummond, Caitlin [1 ]
Fischhoff, Baruch [2 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15206 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会;
关键词
individual differences; decision making; judgment; scientific reasoning; science communication; MECHANICAL TURK; SCIENCE; ATTITUDES; INFORMATION; LITERACY; QUALITY; BIAS;
D O I
10.1002/bdm.1906
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Scientific findings and innovations play an important role in a range of decisions faced by nonscientists, yet little is known about the skills that nonscientists need in order to read and evaluate scientific evidence. Drawing on research in public understanding of science, cognitive developmental psychology, and behavioral decision research, we develop an individual difference measure of scientific reasoning skills, defined as the skills needed to evaluate scientific findings in terms of the factors that determine their quality. We present the results of three studies assessing its psychometric validity. Our results indicate that the Scientific Reasoning Scale (SRS) is internally consistent and distinct from extant measures of scientific literacy. Participants with higher SRS scores are more likely to have beliefs consistent with the scientific consensus on potentially contentious issues, above and beyond education, political and religious beliefs, and scores on two widely used measures of scientific literacy. Participants with higher SRS scores also had better performance on a task requiring them to analyze scientific information. Our results suggest that the SRS provides a theoretically informed contribution to decoding lay responses to scientific results and controversies. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 38
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis [J].
Allum, Nick ;
Sturgis, Patrick ;
Tabourazi, Dimitra ;
Brunton-Smith, Ian .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2008, 17 (01) :35-54
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, The Research Methods Knowledge Base
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SCI ENG IND 2014
[4]  
[Anonymous], PSYCH PROCEDURES PER
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Global warming's six Americas, May 2011
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2003, The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HDB RES METHODS SOCI
[9]   Assessment of risk of bias in translational science [J].
Barkhordarian, Andre ;
Pellionisz, Peter ;
Dousti, Mona ;
Lam, Vivian ;
Gleason, Lauren ;
Dousti, Mahsa ;
Moura, Josemar ;
Chiappelli, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2013, 11
[10]   Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? [J].
Buhrmester, Michael ;
Kwang, Tracy ;
Gosling, Samuel D. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) :3-5