Simulation of the Indonesian land gravity data using a digital terrain model data

被引:3
作者
Heliani, LS [1 ]
Fukuda, Y [1 ]
Takemoto, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Sci, Kyoto 6068502, Japan
来源
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE | 2004年 / 56卷 / 01期
关键词
gravity simulation; residual terrain model (RTM); topography; isostatic;
D O I
10.1186/BF03352487
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The Indonesian gravity field is neither accurately nor comprehensively determined, especially due to inadequacy of land gravity data. This study deals with determination of Indonesian land gravity and proposes the solution to data unavailability by means of a simulation technique. The simulation was carried out by combining short wavelength topographic effects from GTOPO30 and long wavelength information from EGM96. The simulated result was then compared with the observed gravity data. Over Java, Sumatra and Sulawesi islands, using three methods commonly used on the computation of topographic effect; topography, isostatic and RTM (Residual Terrain Model), it was estimated that error propagation by the GTOPO30 into the simulated gravity is about 4.5 to 11.7 mgal, with the RTM method was affected less than others. It was also shown that the simulated gravity from the RTM method gave the best agreement with STD (Standard Deviation) differences of 17 to 42 mgal compared to the observed data. This result was achieved after applying optimal RTM parameters over the Indonesian area: a reference field of 25'-27.5' and density of 2-2.2 gr/cm(3). Compared to STD differences between EGM96 and observed data, that between the simulated gravity and observed data improved by 2.5-7 mgal, and gave more detailed gravity features, especially over areas of high topography.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 24
页数:10
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
BAJRACHARYA S, 2001, IAG M BUD
[2]   The AUSGeoid98 geoid model of Australia: data treatment, computations and comparisons with GPS-levelling data [J].
Featherstone, WE ;
Kirby, JF ;
Kearsley, AHW ;
Gilliland, JR ;
Johnston, GM ;
Steed, J ;
Forsberg, R ;
Sideris, MG .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2001, 75 (5-6) :313-330
[3]  
Forsberg R., 1985, Bulletin Geodesique, V59, P342, DOI 10.1007/BF02521068
[4]  
*GET, 1995, S E AS GAV PROJ TECH
[5]  
Heiskanen W.A., 1967, PHYS GEODESY, DOI DOI 10.1007/B139113
[6]  
Kahar J., 1997, INT ASS GEODESY S, V117, P613
[7]  
KEARSLEY AHW, 1994, INT ASS GODESY S, V113, P433
[8]  
LEMOINE FG, 1997, IAG S, V117, P461
[9]   How to handle topography in practical geoid determination: three examples [J].
Omang, OCD ;
Forsberg, R .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2000, 74 (06) :458-466
[10]  
PRIJATNA K, 1998, DEOS PROGR LETT, V1, P101