Landscape context and habitat type as drivers of bee diversity in European annual crops

被引:128
作者
Carre, Gabriel [1 ]
Roche, Philip [2 ]
Chifflet, Remy [1 ]
Morison, Nicolas [1 ]
Bommarco, Riccardo [3 ]
Harrison-Cripps, Jenn [4 ]
Krewenka, Kristin [5 ]
Potts, Simon G. [6 ]
Roberts, Stuart P. M. [6 ]
Rodet, Guy [1 ]
Settele, Josef [7 ]
Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf [8 ]
Szentgyorgyi, Hajnalka [9 ]
Tscheulin, Thomas [10 ]
Westphal, Catrin [8 ]
Woyciechowski, Michal [9 ]
Vaissiere, Bernard E. [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, UMR Abeilles & Environm 406, F-84914 Avignon 9, France
[2] Irstea, UR EMAX, CS 40061, F-13182 Aix En Provence 5, France
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Ecol, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Univ Stirling, Sch Biol & Environm Sci, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[5] Univ Gottingen, Dept Agroecol, Gottingen, Germany
[6] Univ Reading, Sch Agr Policy & Dev, CAER, Reading RG6 6AR, Berks, England
[7] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Helmholtz Ctre Environm Res, Dept Community Ecol, D-06120 Halle, Germany
[8] Univ Bayreuth, Populat Ecol Grp, Dept Anim Ecol 1, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany
[9] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Environm Sci, PL-30387 Krakow, Poland
[10] Univ Aegean, Dept Geog, Lab Biogeog & Ecol, GR-81100 Mitilini, Greece
关键词
Bee biodiversity; Annual crops; Landscape ecology; Apiformes; Pollinators; Europe; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; POLLINATION; BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITIES; RICHNESS; HYMENOPTERA; DENSITIES; ECOLOGY; FLOWERS; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2009.05.001
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
To better understand the dynamics of bee populations in crops, we assessed the effect of landscape context and habitat type on bee communities in annual entomophilous crops in Europe. We quantified bee communities in five pairs of crop-country: buckwheat in Poland, cantaloupe in France, field beans in the UK, spring oilseed rape in Sweden, and strawberries in Germany. For each country, 7-10 study fields were sampled over a gradient of increasing proportion of semi-natural habitats in the surrounding landscape. The CORINE land cover classification was used to characterize the landscape over a 3 km radius around each study field and we used multivariate and regression analyses to quantify the impact of landscape features on bee abundance and diversity at the sub-generic taxonomic level. Neither overall wild bee abundance nor diversity, taken as the number of sub-genera. was significantly affected by the proportion of semi-natural habitat. Therefore, we used the most precise level of the CORINE classification to examine the possible links between specific landscape features and wild bee communities. Bee community composition fell into three distinct groups across Europe: group I included Poland, Germany, and Sweden, group 2 the UK, and group 3 France. Among all three groups, wild bee abundance and sub-generic diversity were affected by 17 landscape elements including some semi-natural habitats (e.g., transitional wood land-shrub), some urban habitats (e.g., sport and leisure facilities) and some crop habitats (e.g., non-irrigated arable land). Some bee taxa were positively affected by urban habitats only, others by semi-natural habitats only, and others by a combination of semi-natural, urban and crop habitats. Bee sub-genera favoured by urban and crop habitats were more resistant to landscape change than those favoured only by semi-natural habitats. In agroecosystems, the agricultural intensification defined as the loss of semi-natural habitats does not necessarily cause a decline in evenness at the local level, but can change community composition towards a bee fauna dominated by common taxa. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 47
页数:8
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Interaction diversity within quantified insect food webs in restored and adjacent intensively managed meadows [J].
Albrecht, Matthias ;
Duelli, Peter ;
Schmid, Bernhard ;
Mueller, Christine B. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2007, 76 (05) :1015-1025
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, PRACTICAL POLLINATIO
[3]   Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands [J].
Biesmeijer, J. C. ;
Roberts, S. P. M. ;
Reemer, M. ;
Ohlemueller, R. ;
Edwards, M. ;
Peeters, T. ;
Schaffers, A. P. ;
Potts, S. G. ;
Kleukers, R. ;
Thomas, C. D. ;
Settele, J. ;
Kunin, W. E. .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5785) :351-354
[4]  
Booth BD, 2002, WEED SCI, V50, P2, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0002:AIATAT]2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   AN ORDINATION OF THE UPLAND FOREST COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN [J].
BRAY, JR ;
CURTIS, JT .
ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1957, 27 (04) :326-349
[7]   Consequences of changing biodiversity [J].
Chapin, FS ;
Zavaleta, ES ;
Eviner, VT ;
Naylor, RL ;
Vitousek, PM ;
Reynolds, HL ;
Hooper, DU ;
Lavorel, S ;
Sala, OE ;
Hobbie, SE ;
Mack, MC ;
Diaz, S .
NATURE, 2000, 405 (6783) :234-242
[8]   NONPARAMETRIC MULTIVARIATE ANALYSES OF CHANGES IN COMMUNITY STRUCTURE [J].
CLARKE, KR .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1993, 18 (01) :117-143
[9]  
Dalgaard P., 2002, INTRO STAT R
[10]   Evolution of sociality in a primitively eusocial lineage of bees [J].
Danforth, BN .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (01) :286-290