Outcome of ratio of lymph node metastasis in gastric carcinoma

被引:223
作者
Bando, E
Yonemura, Y
Taniguchi, K
Fushida, S
Fujimura, T
Miwa, K
机构
[1] Shizuoka Canc Ctr, Gastr Surg Div, Shizuoka, Japan
[2] Kanazawa Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg 2, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920, Japan
关键词
gastric cancer; ratio of lymph node metastasis; Will Rogers" phenomenon; multivariate analysis;
D O I
10.1245/ASO.2002.10.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to clarify the outcome of the ratio of the metastatic lymph nodes (RML) in gastric cancer patients. Methods: The postoperative survival of 650 patients with gastric cancer who underwent D2 curative gastrectomy was analyzed with regard to the RML. The location, number, and RML in the N1 station and in all (N1 and N2) stations were analyzed. These data were compared from the viewpoints of staging accuracy and patient survival. Results: The RML was classified as follows: RML 0, no involvement; RML 1, 0 to. 1; RML 2, A to .25; and RML 3, greater than or equal to.25. The 5-year survival rates stratified by RML were RML 0, 86%; RML 1, 68%; RML 2, 35%; and RML 3, 16%. Cox model identified all methods of classifying lymph node metastases as independent prognostic indicators in each calculation. However, a second Cox regression revealed that RML was the only independent prognostic factor among the three methods (P <.001). Stage migration was present in 35 cases (15%) when the number was considered. However, only 15 cases (7%) were underdiagnosed when RML was used. Conclusions: RML is a useful classification of patients with gastric cancer. It may prevent the phenomenon of stage migration.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 784
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF THE NUMBER OF POSITIVE LYMPH-NODES IN GASTRIC-CARCINOMA [J].
ADACHI, Y ;
KAMAKURA, T ;
MORI, M ;
BABA, H ;
MAEHARA, Y ;
SUGIMACHI, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (03) :414-416
[2]   The new Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma: Points to be revised [J].
Takashi Aiko ;
Mitsuru Sasako .
Gastric Cancer, 1998, 1 (1) :25-30
[3]  
[Anonymous], JPN J GASTROENTEROL
[4]  
BABA H, 1989, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V124, P1061
[5]  
BONDER BE, 1988, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V123, P1023
[6]   Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer [J].
Bonenkamp, JJ ;
Hermans, J ;
Sasako, M ;
van de Velde, CJH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (12) :908-914
[7]  
BOZZETTI F, 1986, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V162, P229
[8]   LYMPH-NODE STAGING STANDARDS IN GASTRIC-CANCER [J].
BUNT, AMG ;
HOGENDOORN, PCW ;
VANDEVELDE, CJH ;
BRUIJN, JA ;
HERMANS, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (09) :2309-2316
[9]   SURGICAL PATHOLOGICAL-STAGE MIGRATION CONFOUNDS COMPARISONS OF GASTRIC-CANCER SURVIVAL RATES BETWEEN JAPAN AND WESTERN COUNTRIES [J].
BUNT, AMG ;
HERMANS, J ;
SMIT, VTHBM ;
VANDEVELDE, CJH ;
FLEUREN, GJ ;
BRUIJN, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (01) :19-25
[10]   EVALUATION OF THE EXTENT OF LYMPHADENECTOMY IN A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF WESTERN-TYPE VERSUS JAPANESE-TYPE SURGERY IN GASTRIC-CANCER [J].
BUNT, AMG ;
HERMANS, J ;
BOON, MC ;
VANDEVELDE, CJH ;
SASAKO, M ;
FLEUREN, GJ ;
BRUIJN, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (02) :417-422